Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 30:374-377 (1990)
© 1990 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kraemer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Benepal, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kraemer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Benepal, P. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kraemer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Benepal, P. S.

Field Evaluation of Soybean for Mexican Bean Beetle Resistance. II. Maturity Groups III, IV, and V

M. E. Kraemer*, M. Rangappa, T. Mebrahtu and P. S. Benepal

P.O. Box 265, Agricultural Res. Stn., Virginia State Univ., Petersburg, VA 23803

* Corresponding author.

Field screening of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., germplasm for resistance to insect defoliation was undertaken because of the narrow genetic base currently available to plant breeders and the lack of a comprehensive screening for resistance in most maturity groups (MGs). This study was conducted to evaluate plant introductions (PIs) in MGs III, IV, and V for resistance to defoliation by Mexican bean beetle (MBB), Epilachna varivestis Mulsant. All available Pis were screened to 475822C, 476914, and 424553 in MGs III, IV, and V, respectively, at the Randolph Research Farm of Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA. Resistance was determined by visually estimating the percent defoliation by MBB. Soybean accessions were initially screened in 2-m rows. Selections from these screenings were twice retested in triplicate. Maturity Group V contained most of the resistant germplasm, including Pis 423901-1, 417235 (‘Ouu 3’), and 200450 (‘Akita Ahi’). However, two breeding lines (L76-0132 and L76-0049), derived from the highly resistant P1 171451 in MG VII, had the least defoliation in MG V. Three moderately resistant Pis (360847 [‘Shiromeyntaka’], 248511 [‘Hakuho No. 1’], and 407820) were found in MG IV. P1417152 (‘Mikuri 42’) (MG III) also showed some resistance. Higher levels of insect resistance appear to be present in later maturity group soybean germplasm.


Contribution of VSU Agric. Res. Stn., Journal Article Series no. 163.

Received for publication April 7, 1989.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. Mebrahtu and M. Kraemer
Registration of VS94-11, VS94-12, and VS94-21 Soybean Germplasm Lines Resistant to Corn Earworm Foliar Damage
Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 701 - 702.
[Full Text]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. Mebrahtu, M. Kraemer, and T. Andebrhan
Evaluation of Soybean Breeding Lines for Corn Earworm Antibiosis
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1465 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Crop Science Society of America.