Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 30:105-111 (1990)
© 1990 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Holaday, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Holaday, A. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Holaday, A. S.

Leaf Water Content and Gas-Exchange Parameters of Two Wheat Genotypes Differing in Drought Resistance

Steven W. Ritchie, Henry T. Nguyen* and A. Scott Holaday

Dep. of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47909
Dep. of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Entomology
Dep. of Biological Sci., Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409

* Corresponding author.

It is still unclear what parameter(s), other than grain yield, might be a suitable indicator in a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding program for drought resistance. In this study, the leaf relative water content (RWC) and gas-exchange parameters were compared between a drought-resistant winter wheat genotype (cv. TAM W-101) and a drought-susceptible genotype (cv. Sturdy) to determine if these physiological parameters contribute to drought resistance in TAM W-101. Plants were grown under well-watered conditions in growth chambers until drought stress was imposed by limited watering of plants at anthesis or during vegetative growth. In both growth stages, TAM W-101 maintained a higher RWC and apparent photosynthesis (A) than Sturdy under moderate to severe drought stress. TAM W-101 plants also maintained a higher photosynthetic capacity (higher A at a given intercellular CO2 concentration [Ci]) under stress than did Sturdy in both growth stages. Photosynthetic water use efficiency (pWUE = A/stomatal conductance) generally increased with stress severity until very severe stress levels were attained. Thus, genotypic pWUE comparisons using stressed plants should be evaluated on a water-status basis (e.g., RWC) to avoid the confounding effect of stress severity on pWUE. TAM W-101 tended to have higher pWUE (RWC basis) than Sturdy under moderate to severe stress conditions, but not under well-watered conditions. High leaf RWC, A, and photosynthetic capacity are traits that may contribute to drought resistance in TAM W-101.


This work was supported by a grant from the Southwest Consortium on Plant Genetics and Water Resources (USDA-CSRS-86-2-2748) and by grant from the Texas Advanced Technology Research Program. Contribution of the College of Agric. Sciences, Texas Tech Univ. Journal no. T-4-221.

Received for publication October 24, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. T. Baker, D. C. Gitz, P. Payton, D. F. Wanjura, and D. R. Upchurch
Using Leaf Gas Exchange to Quantify Drought in Cotton Irrigated Based on Canopy Temperature Measurements
Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1990 by the Crop Science Society of America.