Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:1463-1468 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Omwega, C. O.
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Omwega, C. O.
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Omwega, C. O.
Right arrow Articles by Waines, J. G.

Identification of New Sources of Resistance to Root-knot Nematodes in Phaseolus

C. O. Omwega and I. J. Thomason*

Dep. of Nematology, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

P. A. Roberts and J. G. Waines

Univ. of California, Kearney Agric. Center, Parlier, 93648
Dep. of Botany and Plant Sciences, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

* Corresponding author.

Resistance to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and white) Chitwood, has been identified and incorporated into commercial cultivars of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. However, the effective use of host resistance as a management tactic against root-knot nematodes attacking common bean requires identification and incorporation of resistance to other economically important root-knot nematodes, namely M.javanica (Treub) Chitwood, M. arenaria and M. hapla. Fifty-four common bean and 64 tepary bean, P. acutifolius A. Gray, lines were screened for resistance to root-knot nematodes under greenhouse and growth chamber conditions. In the greenhouse, the plants were grown in pots filled with loamy sand and, in the growth chamber, the plants were grown in growth pouches. Bean plants in the greehouse were inoculated with 5000 nematode eggs and evaluated for nematode reproduction (eggs) 6 wk after inoculation. In the growth chamber, plants were inoculated with 1000 second-stage juveniles and evaluated for egg numbers 4 wk after inoculation. Common bean lines PI 165426 and Alabama no. 1 were found to be resistant to M. incognita Race 2, 3 and 4 but were susceptible to M. incognita Race 1 and to M. arenaria. Breeding lines A252, A315, A328, A443 and A445 were resistant to M. javanica and M. incognita Race 1. Resistance in the A lines was found to be derived from two common bean landraces, G1805 and G2618. The resistance was also effective against M. arenaria. The tepary bean accession PI 310606 was found to have good resistance to all nematode isolates tested. We postulate that resistance derived from G1805 and G2618 may be under different genetic control than that in PI 165426 and Alabama no. 1.


Part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree in Plant Pathology.

Received for publication November 25, 1988.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.