HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bowman, D. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bowman, D. T. Agricola Articles by Bowman, D. T.

Plot Configuration in Corn Yield Trials

Dep. of Crop Science, Box 8604, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-8604

^* Corresponding author.

It is generally assumed that bordered plots are efficient for reducing error variance and the associated bias from border effects. Conflicting results in the literature regarding use of borders in corn (Zea mays L.) grain trials and limited information on use of borders in corn silage (herbage) trials prompted studies on the most efficient plot size and the need for bordered plots in corn grain and silage yield trials. The studies encompassed five and six environments over a span of 4 yr for silage and grain, respectively. Silage trials included from 24 to 28 hybrids each year. Grain trials included three different maturity groups with 18 to 64 entries. Four-row plots were used with the center two rows representing bordered two-row plots and the outside two rows considered as unbordered two-row plots. Bordered two-row plots were 1.06 and 1.02 as efficient in reducing error variance as unbordered two-row plots for silage and grain, respectively. The hybrid by border interactions generally were not significant, and highly significant yield and rank correlations suggest that very little border bias was occurring. Four-row unbordered plots were only 1.30 and 1.48 as efficient as the two-row bordered plots for silage and grain trials, respectively. The greatest gain in efficiency, while not compromising estimation of relative hybrid yields (1.89 and 2.26) came from using two-row unbordered plots and doubling the number of replicates for silage and grain yield trials, respectively, vs. the two-row bordered plots.

Received for publication May 12, 1988.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. David, H. Monod, J. Lorgeou, and G. Philippeau Control of Interplot Interference in Grain Maize: A Multi-Site Comparison Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 406 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.W. Esgar and D.G. Bullock Thinning Border Rows Differentially Affects Hybrids in Corn Yield Trials Crop Sci., September 1, 1999; 39(5): 1358 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text]