Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:1140-1145 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Romagosa, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Romagosa, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McCaig, T. N.
Right arrow Articles by Romagosa, I.

Measurement and Use of Excised-Leaf Water Status in Wheat

T. N. McCaig* and I. Romagosa, NATO visiting scientist

Res. Stn., Res. Branch, Agric. Canada, Swift Current, Saskatchewan, S9H 3X2
Permanent address: Dep. of Crop Production, UPC-IRTA, R. Roure 177, 25006 Lerida, Spain

* Corresponding author.

Water status of intact and excised leaves has been reported to be related to drought resistance. Automation of leaf weighing has enabled more rapid and detailed examination of water content and water loss following excision than was previously possible. Our objective was to evaluate these measurements as screening techniques in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) and hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding programs. Among eight genotypes, those adapted to dryland exhibited high initial water content (IWC) (dry weight basis) and/or low rate of water loss (RWL) suggesting that both characters may contribute to the maintenance of leaf water status during periods of severe drought. Differences among tetraploid genotypes, for IWC and RWL, were more consistent than among hexaploid types. Both IWC and RWL of the most recently fully expanded (MRFE) leaf decreased as a function of thermal time indicating that maturity differences among genotypes must be considered. Genotypic differences were more pronounced when sampling was carried out prior to heading. Leaf selection was also important since the RWL of the MRFE leaf of the main stem was lower than that of the penultimate leaf. Controlled environment (well-watered) results were similar to those obtained from the field (rainfed), indicating that screening may be possible in growth chambers. Phenological, genotypic, and environmental effects on these parameters are further discussed, including procedures and cautions concerning the use of these techniques.

Received for publication September 23, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. Basal, C. W. Smith, P. S. Thaxton, and J. K. Hemphill
Seedling Drought Tolerance in Upland Cotton
Crop Sci., February 23, 2005; 45(2): 766 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.