Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:752-757 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, L.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, L.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, L.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R.

Agronomic Performance of Spring Wheat Isolines Differing for Daylength Response

L. Marshall and R. Busch*

Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

F. Cholick, I. Edwards and R. Frohberg

Plant Science Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings SD 57007
Pioneer Overseas Corp., Box 316, Johnston, IA 50131
Dep. of Agronomy, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105

* Corresponding author.

Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) can be either daylength sensitive or insensitive. Sensitive wheat require long days for timely flowering, whereas insensitive wheat mature normally even in short days. The objective of this study was to compare near-isogenic daylength insensitive and sensitive hard red spring wheat lines to determine whether insensitivity had adverse effects on agronomic traits and grain protein. Eleven pairs of phenotypically diverse hard red spring wheat lines near isogenic for daylength response were evaluated in 25 environments in the upper Midwest. The grain yield for insensitive lines of all pairs was the same as or higher than for the sensitive lines, averaged over all environments. Yield differences between paired insensitive and sensitive lines varied for specific environments, but a general yield disadvantage for insensitive lines was not observed in any environment. Insensitive lines tended to outyield their sensitive counterparts in environments with lower mean yields or shorter grain fill periods. The insensitive lines were earlier in heading than the sensitive lines for most but not all pairs. Grain protein content for insensitive lines was the same as or lower than for sensitive lines, but selection of insensitive lines with adequate protein should not be difficult. The incorporation of insensitivity appears to result in genotypes generally well adapted to the upper Midwest, and may have beneficial effects on some agronomic traits.


Joint contribution from USDA-ARS and Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., South Dakota Exp. Stn., and North Dakota Exp. Stn. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Scientific Journal Series Paper no. 15892.

Received for publication May 5, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. Iqbal, A. Navabi, R.-C. Yang, D. F. Salmon, and D. Spaner
The Effect of Vernalization Genes on Earliness and Related Agronomic Traits of Spring Wheat in Northern Growing Regions
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1031 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. A. Dyck, M. A. Matus-Cadiz, P. Hucl, L. Talbert, T. Hunt, J. P. Dubuc, H. Nass, G. Clayton, J. Dobb, and J. Quick
Agronomic Performance of Hard Red Spring Wheat Isolines Sensitive and Insensitive to Photoperiod
Crop Sci., November 1, 2004; 44(6): 1976 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.