Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:636-639 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.

Potential for Increasing Cotton Yields Through Enhanced Partitioning to Reproductive Structures

William R. Meredith, Jr.* and Randy Wells

USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Dep. of Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695

* Corresponding author.

Yield increases in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) have been primarily through changes in partitioning dry matter from vegetative to reproductive structures. The objective of this study was to determine if yield increases would likely continue through continued changes in dry matter partitioning. Five obsolete cultivars, five popular and high yielding cultivars from five cotton breeding organizations, and 15 advanced strains from five cotton breeding organizations were used for yield and growth analyses at three environments, two in 1985 and one in 1986. Obsolete cultivars averaged 24% less lint than the 20 more modern genotypes and showed greater investment of dry matter into vegetative rather than reproductive structures. There was no major difference in mean yield or growth characteristics detected between the five currently used cultivars and the 15 strains. However, these 20 genotypes showed significant (P < 0.05) genetic variability for yield and most growth characteristics. Plant height and stem wt. to total dry wt. ratio showed strong negative genetic correlations with yield (r = –0.44 to –0.80). Strong positive genetic associations with yield were found for boll wt. to total dry wt. ratio (r = 0.86) and the late sampling of reproductive-vegetative ratio (r = 0.91). This study suggests that yield increases through the use of conventional breeding methods are likely to be achieved through continued partitioning of dry matter from vegetative to reproductive structures.

Received for publication April 1, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. F. Zhang, Y. Lu, H. Adragna, and E. Hughs
Genetic Improvement of New Mexico Acala Cotton Germplasm and Their Genetic Diversity
Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2363 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. H. Jost and J. T. Cothren
Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra-Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1150 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
Anis-ur-Rehman, R. Wells, and T. G. Isleib
Reproductive Allocation on Branches of Virginia-Type Peanut Cultivars Bred for Yield in North Carolina
Crop Sci., January 1, 2001; 41(1): 72 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
P. H. Jost and J.T. Cothren
Growth and Yield Comparisons of Cotton Planted in Conventional and Ultra-Narrow Row Spacings
Crop Sci., March 1, 2000; 40(2): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.