Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:607-612 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kannenberg, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Corke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kannenberg, L. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Corke, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kannenberg, L. W.

Selection for Vegetative Phase and Actual Filling Period Duration in Short Season Maize

H. Corke and L. W. Kannenberg*

Dep. of Agronomy and Range Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616
Dep. of Crop Sci.,Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

* Corresponding author.

Optimum use of the limited growing period for maize (Zea mays L.) in short season areas is essential to maximize grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of vegetative phase duration (VPD), i.e., time from planting to silk emergence, and actual filling period duration (AFPD) on grain yield and its components in short season maize germplasm. Eleven random mating populations were subjected to divergent selection to form four subpopulations in each that varied in VPD and AFPD, both measured on an Ontario Corn Heat Units (CHU) basis. The material was evaluated in three environments in Ontario, viz., Innerkip 1981, Woodstock 1982, and Ridgetown 1982. Soil type at each location was a Burford silt loam (Typic Hapludalf). The direct effects of selection, and the correlated responses of other agronomic traits, including grain yield, were significant for most traits. For example, at Ridgetown 1982 average differences between the two extreme subpopulation groups were 200 CHU for VPD, 57 CHU for AFPD, 46 g kg–1 for grain moisture at harvest, and 2.0 Mg ha–1 for grain yield. The joint effect of varying VPD and AFPD on grain yield and components, i.e., kernel number per plant and 1000 kernel mass, was assessed by fitting quadratic response surface models. Increased VPD had positive, significant effects on grain yield; increased AFPD had slight positive effects but these were generally not significant. Differences in kernel number per plant contributed most to grain yield variation within any environment, whereas 1000 kernel mass contributed most to grain yield differences across environments. These results indicate a vegetative size limitation for grain yield of short season maize in the material studied. This should not be interpreted strictly as a source (supply of photoassimilate) limitation during the grain filling period, because preanthesis source size may partly determine kernel number per plant and thus affect sink size.


Grant Funding provided by the Canadian Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan, Natural Sciences and Engineering Res. Council, and Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.

Received for publication May 4, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
E. A. Lee and M. Tollenaar
Physiological Basis of Successful Breeding Strategies for Maize Grain Yield
Crop Sci., December 18, 2007; 47(Supplement_3): S-202 - S-215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.