Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:360-362 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by White, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, J. A.

Relative Effect of Root and Shoot Genotypes on Yield of Common Bean under Drought Stress

J. W. White* and J. A. Castillo

CIAT, Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia

* Corresponding author.

The inherent interactions of roots and shoots make it difficult to determine whether a characteristic such as response to drought is under control of genes expressed in roots, shoots, or throughout the plant. One approach for obtaining such information is to interchange root and shoot genotypes through grafting. In this study, plants of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were cleft grafted and then transplanted to the field to evaluate their yield response under drought. Anticipating that the importance of root or shoot genotype would vary with genotypes evaluated, variation in rainfall patterns, and soil conditions, four yield trials with varying sets of genotypes were conducted at two sites with highly contrasting soils. At Palmira, Colombia, the soil was a fertile Mollisol (Aquic Hapludoll, pH = 7.7), and at Quilichao, Colombia, an Oxisol (Plinthic Kandiudox, pH = 5.0), where problem of low pH and high Al saturation were expected to adversely affect root growth. In all trials, root genotype had a significant and usually large effect on seed yield, while shoot genotype had no effect. No root and shoot genotype interaction occurred, and an effect of grafting was only detected in one trial. These results suggest that root characteristics are of primary importance in determining drought response of common bean and, conversely, that shoot characteristics are of much less importance. However, response of specific genotypes varies greatly with environment.

Received for publication April 19, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. P. Singh
Drought Resistance in the Race Durango Dry Bean Landraces and Cultivars
Agron. J., August 10, 2007; 99(5): 1219 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
L. Rodriguez-Uribe and M. A. O'Connell
A root-specific bZIP transcription factor is responsive to water deficit stress in tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) and common bean (P. vulgaris)
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2006; 57(6): 1391 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
N. FERNANDEZ-GARCIA, M. CARVAJAL, and E. OLMOS
Graft Union Formation in Tomato Plants: Peroxidase and Catalase Involvement
Ann. Bot., January 1, 2004; 93(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
V. R. Pantalone, G. J. Rebetzke, J. W. Burton, T. E. Carter Jr., and D. W. Israel
Soybean PI 416937 Root System Contributes to Biomass Accumulation in Reciprocal Grafts
Agron. J., September 1, 1999; 91(5): 840 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.