Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 29:286-289 (1989)
© 1989 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pilcher, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pilcher, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pfeiffer, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Pilcher, D. L.

Hill vs. Row Plots in Predicting Full-Season and Late-Planted Soybean Yield

T. W. Pfeiffer* and D. L. Pilcher

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091

* Corresponding author.

Hill plots have been shown to be useful as initial yield test plots for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] under full-season production conditions. The objectives of this research were to determine the value of hill plots for yield selection at double-crop planting dates and to characterize the number of plants per hill needed to maximize yield at these delayed planting dates. Twenty-eight genotypes in each of three maturity classifications were grown in full-season(average planting date 21 May and late-planted (average planting date 4 July) hill plots and row plots at one location in each of 3 yr as prediction environments. These same genotypes were grow in row plots in full-season and late-planted evaluation tests to establish genotype yield rankings. In both the full-season and late-planted tests, correlation coefficients were calculated for genotype yields in row plots and hill plots in each prediction environment with genotype mean yields in row plots in the evaluation tests. These correlation coefficients were used to assess the value of the different plot types as predictors of genotype yield rankings. Hill plots were as good as row plots as a predictor both for full-season yields and for late-planted yields based on mean productivity [(full-season yield + late-planted yield)/2]. Hill plots, however, were inadequate for predicting late-planted yields when the selection criterion was late planted yield itself. Plant populations of three cultivars were varied from 1 to 10 plants per hill plot in full-season and late-planted tests at one location for 2 yr. Seven plants per hill plot maximized yield in the late-planted test.


This Paper no., 88-3-134 is published with the approval of the Director of the Kentucky Agric. Exp. Stn.

Received for publication May 31, 1988.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Crop Science Society of America.