Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:907-912 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jones, T. A.

A Probability Method for Comparing Varieties against Checks

T. A. Jones

USDA-ARS, Forage and Range Res. Lab., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT 84322-6300

Combining results of tests conducted over a period of years is desirable when the tests are conducted at a single location or across locations known not to exhibit large nonrandom, predictable genotype x location interactions. But when cumulative reports across tests are attempted, complications arise because of unbalanced structure. The objective of this work was to derive a method to compare varieties against checks using accumulated data in the usual situation, where varieties are changing over the years the accumulated tests are conducted. The resultant probability method is easy to use, easy to present in an extension publication, and easy to interpret by the extension audience. It tests the null hypothesis that a variety equals a check in performance and permits calculation of the probability that the variety equals a check in performance when the null hypothesis is rejected (type 1 error). Calculations are simplified data are coded and standardized for each test year. The method was used on an unbalanced data set yield of 23 varieties and 35 test years of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) grown near Ames, IA. Probability of one-tailed Type I erroranged from 0.47 to near 0.00 when data were coded on a test-year mean basis, and from 0.86 to near 0.00 when data were coded on the basis of the mean of ‘Saranac’ and ‘Vernal’. The probability method determined that no more than seven test years were necessary to evaluate these varieties.


Joint contribution of USDA-ARS Forage and Range Res. Lab. and the Utah Agric. Exp. Stn., Journal Paper no. 3469

Received for publication December 21, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. C. Helms and J. J. Hammond
Genetic Gain Equation with Correlated Genotype x Environment Effects
Crop Sci., March 27, 2006; 46(3): 1137 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. C. Helms, J. H. Orf, and J. T. Terpstra
Resource Allocation to Select for Yield in Soybean
Crop Sci., September 1, 2002; 42(5): 1493 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.