HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhagsari, A. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bhagsari, A. S. Agricola Articles by Bhagsari, A. S.

Phosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance of selected Root Crops asa Related to Leaf Age

Agricultural Res. Stn. Fort Valley State College, Fort Valley, Georgia 31030

Single leaf net photosynthesis (Pn), canopy photosynthesis (CPn) and stomatal conductance of sweet potato (lpomoea batatas L.), cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and yam (Dioscorea alata) were determined under field conditions in full sunlight (above 1500 gmol m^–2s^–1) between 1100 and 1500 h EST during 1983 and 1984. Canopy photosynthesis was determined with a portable plexiglass photosynthesis chamber in a closed system under ambient conditions. Single leaf net photosynthesis was determined at 30± 2 °C by enclosing attached fully mature leaves in an acrylic plastic chamber in an open system. The mean Pn for sweet potato, cassava, and yam were 1.10, 0.70, and 0,30 mg CO₂ m^–2s ^–1, respectively. Mean CPn rates, expressed on leaf area basis, for sweet potato, cassava, and yam were 0.18, 0.38, and 0.17 mg CO2 m^–2s–², respectively. Abaxial stomatal conductances for cassava and sweet potato were almost similar, but both were three to five times higher than for yam. Adaxial stomatal conductance ranged from 0.007 to 0.010 m s^&1 for sweet potato and was less than 0.001 m s^& for both yam and cassava, indicating the lack of stomata or their poor development on the adaxial surface. With increase in leaf age from about 20 to 60 d, both Pn and stomatal conductance declined faster in sweet potato than in cassava and yam. Single leaf photosynthetic rates were higher for sweet potato than cassava. However, CPn comparisons involving complete plant foliage indicated that photosynthetic efficiency of cassava was superior to that of both sweet potato and yam. Cassava also partitioned more photosynthate to storage roots than the other two species. The lesser decline in cassava Pn with aging (and consequently of CPn) than sweet potato partially explains why cassava productivity is similar to sweet potato even when sweet potato Pn is 50.0% more than that of cassava.

Received for publication September 10, 1987.