Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:848-850 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koski, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Danneberger, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koski, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Danneberger, T. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koski, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Danneberger, T. K.

Prediction of Kentucky Bluegrass Root Growth Using Degree-Day Accumulation

A. J. Koski*, J. R. Street and T. K. Danneberger

Dep. of Horticulture, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Dep. of Agronomy, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210

* Corresponding author.

The ability to predict the progression of turfgrass root formation would be of interest to both researchers and turfgrass practitioners. This capability would allow for improved evaluation of the effects that the timing of various management practices could have on turfgrass root production. The purpose of this study was to develop a model, based on accumulated degree-days (ADD) calculated from soil temperature, which could predict the accumulation of ‘Baron’ Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) root growth during the period of January to June. Temperature at the 10 cm depth (fine quartz sand) and cumulative root length (CRL) data collected in the rhizotron facility at The Ohio State University during 1981, 1982, and 1985 were used to develop the model. Within the confined cultural and environmental conditions of this study, the model accounted for 95% of the observed variation in CRL and the actual equation was: CRL = 5.269 + 0.032(ADD) + 0.0000138(ADD2). Under field conditions, other factors besides temperature and heat unit accumulation would be expected to display strong and independent effects on turfgrass root growth. The development of a widely usable model would include provisions for variations in edaphic conditions and for the great diversity of management practices and maintenance intensity levels which are utilized today.


Salaries and research support provided by state and federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Ctr., Ohio State Univ. Journal article no., 164-88.

Received for publication November 4, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.