Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:825-830 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godshalk, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Godshalk, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Godshalk, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.

Effectiveness of Index Selection for Switchgrass Forage Yield and Quality

E. B. Godshalk and D. H. Timothy*

Dep. of Crop Science

J. C. Burns

USDA-ARS and Dep. of Crop Science and Animal Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7620, Raleigh NC 27695-7620

* Corresponding author.

Index selection has been proposed as an effective method to improve agronomic traits in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), but the actual effectiveness of this selection tool has not been determined. The objective of this research was to ascertain the efficacy of the estimated index when used to improve switchgrass forage yield and in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD). Three populations were generated by selection on the basis of three different sets of criteria: (i) increased yield, with IVDMD and nitrogen concentration (N) as covariates, (ii) increased yield and IVDMD, with N as a covariate, and (iii) increased IVDMD, with yield and N as covariates. Selections were made among a total of 660 Cycle 1 plants, designating 16 plants to comprise each of the three index-derived populations. The resulting groups of plants were allowed to open-pollinate in isolation and their progeny (Cycle 2) were evaluated for forage yield and quality traits. Comparisons were made among the three groups and also with a set of 15 plants randomly chosen to represent the Cycle 0 population. Significant differences were found among the three Cycle 2 groups for yield, in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber. Only the third group, selected for increased IVDMD, had regrowth IVDMD that was significantly greater than that of the Cycle 0 population. Gains in IVDMD were possible, but not without reduced gains in forage yield. Yields of Indices 1 and 2 were significantly greater than the Cycle 0 population yield for both initial growth and regrowth. Canonical discriminant analysis demonstrated the value of the three selection indices in separating the Cycle 2 population into distinct subpopulations with differing attributes. Selection indices were shown to be effective in obtaining moderate increases in trait means and in tailoring switchgrass populations with desired forage production characteristics.


Contribution from North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv. Journal series Paper 11314, in conjunction with USDA-ARS.

Received for publication October 26, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Plant RegistrationsHome page
J. C. Burns, E. B. Godshalk, and D. H. Timothy
Registration of 'Performer' Switchgrass
Journal of Plant Registrations, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 29 - 30.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Plant RegistrationsHome page
J. C. Burns, E. B. Godshalk, and D. H. Timothy
Registration of 'BoMaster' Switchgrass
Journal of Plant Registrations, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 31 - 32.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.