Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:761-764 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raymer, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Raymer, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Raymer, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, R. L.

Response of Current Midwestern Soybean Cultivars to Late Planting

P. L. Raymer* and R. L. Bernard

Agron. Dep., Univ. of Georgia, Georgia Stn., Griffin, GA 30223-1797
USDA-ARS and Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801

* Corresponding author.

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is grown in the Midwestern USA primarily as a full-season crop and only to a limited extent as a double crop following small grains. Development of cultivars specifically adapted to later planting dates commonly associated with double-crop production has been suggested as a means to expand double-crop hectarage in this area. To determine if currently used soybean cultivars differ in their adaptation to late planting and if any specific plant traits are related to improved performance under late-planted conditions, 16 soybean cultivars were evaluated at both conventional (May) and late (late June to early July) planting dates in 1979, 1980, and 1981. Cultivar by planting date interactions were found for days to maturity, height at maturity, seed quality, and seed mottling, but not for yield, days to flowering, height at flowering, lodging, and weight per 100 seeds. All cultivars suffered substantial and similar yield reductions when planted late. Phenotypic correlation coefficients of cultivar performance between the two planting dates were positive and highly significant for all plant traits measured. The relationship of yield with various plant traits varied greatly from year to year and no differences in these relationships were observed between the two planting dates. These results do not furnish any evidence to justify a separate breeding program for the development of double-crop cultivars adapted to the Midwest. The lack of a strong cultivar by planting date interaction for yield and the lack of any strong associations of specific plant characteristics with yield in a late-planted environment imply that testing in a conventional early-planted environment will be effective in identifying lines that perform well in either full-season or double-crop environments.


Contribution from the Dep. of Agron. and USDA-ARS, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. This research was from a thesis by the senior author in partial fulfillment of requirements for the Ph.D. degree at the Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Received for publication August 27, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. Pedersen and J. G. Lauer
Response of Soybean Yield Components to Management System and Planting Date
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1372 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
L. Kilgore-Norquest and C.H. Sneller
Effect of Stem Termination on Soybean Traits in Southern U.S. Production Systems
Crop Sci., January 1, 2000; 40(1): 83 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.