| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Univ. of Hohenheim, P.O. Box 700562/350, 7 Stuttgart 70, West Germany
KWS Kleinwanzlebener Saatzucht AG, 3352 Einbeck, West Germany
* Corresponding author.
Single crosses and backcrosses from established lines are importeat parental sources for developing new inbred lines in hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) breeding. The objectives of this study were (i) compare, both theoretically and experimentally, the testcross properties of F2 vs. first backcross populations; and (ii) to outline criteria for choosing between these two types of base populations in recycling breeding programs. Two homozygous lines (P1, P2) and individual plants from their F2 and first backcross (BC1, BC2) generations were mated to an unrelated single-cross tester. A total of 186 testcross progenies were evaluated for grain and forage traits at three and two locations, respectively. The five generations (P1, P2, F2, BC1, BC2) differed significantly (P < 0.05) in their testcross means (
) for grain (GY) and forage (FY) yield. A nonepistatic model accounted for 92 to 99% of the variation among testcross generation means for five of the six traits examined, yet the presence of epistasis was indicated in several instances. In accordance with theory, the ratio of BC (the pooled estimate of BC1 and BC2) to F2 genotypic variance among testcross progenies (
2g) was close to 0.50 for all traits but one. Heterogeneous 2g estimates in BC1 and BC2 were found for GY, FY, and grain dry matter content, suggesting the presence of epistasis. Predicted selection response for testcross performance (
G) was greatest in the F2. Testcross progenies of the F2, BC1, and BC2 generations displayed similar phenotypic and genotypic correlations as expected by theory. The "usefulness" criterion U = 
+ G was employed to assess the breeding prospects of each generation. With weak selection, the better backcross had superior usefulness for four traits, whereas with strong selection the F2 had highest usefulness for all traits except GY.
Received for publication November 23, 1987.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. S. Baenziger, W. K. Russell, G. L. Graef, and B. T. Campbell Improving Lives: 50 Years of Crop Breeding, Genetics, and Cytology (C-1) Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2230 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mihaljevic, H. F. Utz, and A. E. Melchinger No Evidence for Epistasis in Hybrid and Per Se Performance of Elite European Flint Maize Inbreds from Generation Means and QTL Analyses Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2605 - 2613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Tabanao and R. Bernardo Genetic Variation in Maize Breeding Populations with Different Numbers of Parents Crop Sci., September 23, 2005; 45(6): 2301 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Arbelbide and R. Bernardo Random Mating before Selfing in Maize BC1 Populations Crop Sci., March 1, 2004; 44(2): 401 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Hinze and K. R. Lamkey Absence of Epistasis for Grain Yield in Elite Maize Hybrids Crop Sci., January 1, 2003; 43(1): 46 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Bernardo Breeding Potential of Intra- and Interheterotic Group Crosses in Maize Crop Sci., January 1, 2001; 41(1): 68 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Melchinger, H. F. Utz, and C. C. Schon Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) Mapping Using Different Testers and Independent Population Samples in Maize Reveals Low Power of QTL Detection and Large Bias in Estimates of QTL Effects Genetics, May 1, 1998; 149(1): 383 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
