HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, B. Articles by Wrede, K. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Johnson, B. Articles by Wrede, K. C. Agricola Articles by Johnson, B. Articles by Wrede, K. C.

Application of an Optimization Model to Multi-Trait Selection Programs

USDA-ARS, Wheat and Sorghum Unit
Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Funk Seeds International, Box 2911, Bloomington, IL 61701

^* Corresponding author.

Simultaneous multi-trait selection involves making many separate decisions which ultimately reflect the total value of each genotype being considered. A linear index is frequently used to simplify these decisions. However, use of traditional selection indices has required knowledge of the relative genetic merit of each trait. The objective of this investigation was to devise a method which applied breeders could utilize in determining appropriate relative values for the genetic merits. A procedure was developed whereby approximate values could be derived from a ranking of genotypes. The procedure requires a subjective ranking made by the breeder based on simultaneous consideration of the traits of interest. The utility of the procedure in applied breeding situations was tested. The technique was used to determine the relative merit of each of three traits, grain yield, moisture content of grain at harvest, and percent standing plants at harvest, in six sets of selected and ranked S₂ and S₃ families of maize. The selections and rankings were subjectively made by two experienced maize breeders. The two breeders were unable to numerically express acceptable relative merits, or relative weights, for the three traits prior to the solution of the problem. They were able to state general selection goals and to subjectively rank the families accordingly. The two breeders had basic philosophical differences in selection goals and these differences were detected by the weights derived from the breeders' respective rankings. The method provides flexibility which is lacking in other procedures and has potential utility in applied breeding programs as a management and operational tool.

Received for publication July 13, 1987.