Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:626-630 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Backman, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Backman, P. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Backman, P. A.

Field and Greenhouse Evaluations of Stem Canker Resistance in Soybean

D. B. Weaver* and S. A. Sedhom

Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, 202 Funchess Hall

E. F. Smith and P. A. Backman

Dep. of Plant Pathology, 139 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849

* Corresponding author.

Greenhouse screening using infested toothpicks was compared to field evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.) breeding lines for resistance to stem canker disease, caused by southern strains ofDiaporthe phaseolorum (Cke. & E11. (Sacc.) var. caulivora Athow and Caldwell (Dpc). Field screenings are reliable indicators of resistance, but often the disease does not develop naturally in field screening nurseries. Thirty-seven random F4:6 lines from the cross ‘Hutton’ (susceptible ) x ‘Tracy M’ (resistant) were evaluated for their reaction to Dpc in the field (two locations, 2 yr) under natural infestation and infection conditions, and in the greenhouse (three experiments) with artificial inoculation using infested toothpicks. Our objectives were to compare field and greehouse screening and to determine the usefulness of greenhouse inoculation in predicting the yield and disease reaction of breeding lines when these lines were subjected to natural field infection conditions. Field screening based on symptoms and yield was highly effective in identifying resistant genotypes. Heritabilities for yield and disease ratings in the field were 87 and 92%, respectively. The toothpick inoculation procedure used in the greenhouse was effective with each of three Dpc isolates (different in geographic origin from the field location) in identifying the genotypes that showed highest levels of disease resistance in the field. Phenotypic correlations between greenhouse ratings and yield in the infested field ranged from –0.71 to –0.61. Results indicated that selection based on greenhouse screening can be an effective alternative to field screening when resistance is derived from Tracy M.

Key Words: Glycine max L. • Correlated response to selection • Genetic resistance • Heritability • Response to selection


Contribution from the Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Series no. 3-871352.

Received for publication September 22, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.