Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:558-561 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teuber, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teuber, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, D. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Teuber, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Paige, D. F.

An Electronic Meter for Determining Ease of Tripping of Alfalfa Florets

L. R. Teuber*, E. E. Knapp, D. E. Chaney and D. F. Paige

Department of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616

* Corresponding author.

Numerous methods of assessing ease of tripping of alfalfa (Medicago saliva L.) florets have been reported. The objective of this research was to develop a device that would accurately measure ease of tripping. Four florets from each of 72 greenhouse-grown alfalfa plants chosen randomly from ‘CUF-101’ were tested with the electronic tripping meter on two dates. Concurrently, tripping measurements were also obtained on 68 of the same 72 plants using ethanol. Ease of tripping values measured by the ethanol and electronic tripping meter techniques were correlated (r = 0.32*, significant at the 0.05 probability level; 66 df), but ease of tripping values were more repeatable with the electronic tripping meter than with the ethanol method. Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation between sampling times was greater for values obtained using the electronic tripping meter (r = 0.61**, significant at the 0.01 probability level; 70 df) than for values obtained using ethanol (r = 0.18, 66 df). The electronic tripping meter was a more accurate, more repeatable, and a less time-consuming method.

Key Words: Medicago sativa L. • Lucerne • Pollination • Seed production • Proximity sensor


Supported in part by the Certified Alfalfa Seed Production Res. Board.

Received for publication May 4, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.