Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:508-511 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Stuteville, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Stuteville, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Stuteville, D. L.

Polygenes in Diploid Alfalfa That Affect Resistance to Downy Mildew

D. Z. Skinner* and D. L. Stuteville

Dep. of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Dep. of Plant Pathology, Throckmorton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506

* Corresponding author.

The genetics of resistance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to downy mildew (caused by Peronospora trifoliorum d By.) is complex. Our previous studies with diploid alfalfa indicated that resistance (absence of conidial production) resulted from single dominant genes in some plants, and combinations of minor genes in other plants. The present sludy was conducted with diploid plants possessing only minor resistance genes to determine if different combinations of minor genes conditioned a single disease phenotype, and to determine the dominance relationships of the alleles involved. A seedling test was used in which downy mildew symptoms were described on a 0 (resistant, no conidial production) to 5 (very susceptible, copious conidiai production) infection type (IT) scale. Chi-square analysis of progeny IT data revealed that 30% of paired plants with the same IT were genetically different. Most F2 plants from resistant F1, plants were resistant, whereas susceptible F1, plants produced F2's of all disease scores, including resistance. This was consistent with dominant susceptibility at most loci, and additivity of effects among loci.

Key Words: Lucerne • Genetics of resistance • Medicago sativa L. • Peronospora trifoliorum d By. • Quantitative resistance


Contribution no. 85-453-J, from the Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Kansa State Univ. This research is a portion of D. Z. Skinner's Ph. D. dissertation.

Received for publication May 29, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.