Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:95-100 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J. A.

Growth and Canopy Carbon Dioxide Exchange Rate of Spring Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen Status

Jack A. Morgan*

USDA-ARS Northwest Region, Agric. Eng. Res. Ctr. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523

* Corresponding author.

Little information is currently available describing N nutritional effects on canopy CO2 exchange rate (CER). This field study was conducted to investigate how fertilizer N affects growth and photosynthesis of a dryland wheat (Tritlcum aestivum L.) stand in a Nunn clay loam (Aridic Argiustoll). Two tr eatments were imposed; an unfertilized (U) treatment, in which no fertilizer was applied, and an N-fertilized (F) treatment, in which 100 kg fertilizer N ha-1 was applied in the form of NH4NO3. Greater above ground growth and grain yield of fertilized wheat compared with unfertilized wheat were associated with greater CER and leaf area index throughout ontogeny and with greater crop growth rates early in development. Net assimilation rates, relative growth rates, and CER expressed on a leaf area basis either were unaffected by N or were reduced. However, greater leaf conductance to water vapor in the most recently fully expanded leaves of the F treatment during vegetative growth stages suggests that the upper leaves in the canopy may have had greater photosynthetic activity at that time compared with the U treatment. Utilization of intercepted photosynthetic photon flux density for CER by plants of the F treatment was equal to or greater than for plants of the U treatment despite more self-shading in the former. Greater leaf photosynthetic capacity conferred by N fertilization apparently results in heavily shaded canopies using intercepted light as efficiently as open, better-illuminated unfertilized canopies.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum (L.) • Growth analysis • Photosynthesis • Water potential


Contribution from the USDA-ARS, Agric. Eng. Res. Ctr., Colorado Univ.

Received for publication February 27, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.