Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 28:48-54 (1988)
© 1988 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Allan, R. E.

Inheritance of Stripe Rust Resistance among Near-Isogenic Lines of Spring Wheat

C. A. Griffey and R. E. Allan*

Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 (formerly Dep. Agronomy and Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164)
USDA-ARS, Wheat Genetics, Qulaity, Physiology, and Disease Res. Unit, Pullman, WA 99164

* Corresponding author.

Increased range of virulence of stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis West.) on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the northwestern USA has required assemblage of a broad genetic base of resistance. This study genetically differentiated among 14 sources of stripe rust resistance represented by near-isogenic lines developed in stripe rustsusceptible ‘Lemhi 53.’ Plant reactions of the lines were evaluated in F1, F2, and BC1 populations from resistant by susceptible crosses and in F1 and F2 populations from resistant by resistant crosses. Greenhouse-grown seedlings and field-grown adult plants were tested for their reactions to the fungus. Most lines had resistance believed to be race-specific, and the same gene(s) probably governed both their seedling and adult-plant reactions. Other lines expressed only adult-plant resistance, and some may have had different genes for each type of resistance. Segregation patterns from resistant by susceptible parent crosses suggested monogenic or digenic control of plant reaction to the fungus with digenic expression more common in the field. Some lines with resistance from ‘Brevor’ and ‘Alba’ and other lines with resistance from Alba, ‘Webster’, ‘Giza 139’/‘Gabo’ and ‘Ministre’ probably had gene(s) in common for reaction to the fungus. Some lines derived from Webster, Giza 139/Gabo, and ‘Soissonais’ had gene(s) in common for their adult-plant reactions. The cross ‘Magnif 27’/5*Lemhi 53/3/T. spelta/‘Coastal’//6*Lemhi 53 expressed novel seedling resistance; wherein the F~ progeny derived from susceptible parents expressed digenic control of resistance. Genetic diversity was modest among the various lines, especially for seedling resistance.

Key Words: Triticum eastivum L. • Puccinia striiformisWest. • Yellow rust • Disease resistance


Contribution from the USDA-ARS and the College of Agriculture and Home Economics Res. Ctr., Washington State Univ. Scientific paper no. SP 6930.

Received for publication February 17, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1988 by the Crop Science Society of America.