Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 27:1177-1184 (1987)
© 1987 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flagler, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Heck, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flagler, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Heck, W. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Flagler, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Heck, W. W.

Ozone and Soil Moisture Deficit Effects on Nitrogen Metabolism of Soybean1

R. B. Flagler, R. P. Patterson, A. S. Heagle and W. W. Heck2

Ozone can interfere with nitrogen metabolism of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], but the effect of O3 on nitrogen metabolism of field-grown soybean has received only limited attention. A two-year field study was conducted to determine the effects of soil moisture deficit and O3 on nitrogen metabolism of ‘Davis’ soybean. Two soil moisture regimes, well-watered and water-stressed (WS), were established using different irrigation frequencies. Ozone treatments ranged from 0.025 to 0.107 µL L–1 (7-h day–1 seasonal means) and were charcoal filtered, nonfiltered, and two (1983) or four (1984) levels of 03 addition to nonfiltered ambient air entering open-top field chambers. Growing conditions were quite different between the two years. The 1983 season was dry and hot throughout vegetative growth. In contrast, 1984 was wetter and cooler, with no requirement for irrigation during vegetative growth. Effects due to WS were more pronounced than those due to O3. Nitrogen fixation, estimated by the acetylene reduction (AR) technique, was decreased by both O3 and WS treatments in both years. As O3 concentration increased, there was a decrease in total AR activity and a more rapid decline of activity during reproductive growth. Water deficit decreased AR activity significantly both years. The activity of nitrate reductase (NR) was also decreased by WS treatments. Ozone effects on NR activity varied between years. Rates of N accumulation were generally lower in higher O3 and WS treatments. The partitioning of N among various plant parts and concentrations of N within plant parts were altered in WS treatments during all stages of growth and to a far lesser extent by O3 treatments during reproductive growth. While there were no significant O3 x water regime interactions, the results demonstrate that soil water status has a pronounced effect on plant response to O3.

Key Words: Water stress • Dinitrogen fixation • Nitrate reductase activity • Nitrogen partitioning • Nitrogen accumulation • Glycine max (L.) Merr.


1 Cooperative investigations of North Carolina State Univ. and the USDA-ARS. Research partly supported by an Interagency Agreement between the USEPA and the USDA; Interagency agreement no. AD-12-F-1-490-2. Paper no. 10948 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv., Raleigh, NC 27695-7601.

2 Research assistant, and plant physiologist, Dep. Crop Science; plant pathologist, USDA-ARS and Dep. Plant Pathology; and plant physiologist, USDA-ARS and Dep. of Botany, North Carolina State Univ. Current address of senior author: Forest Science Dep., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843.

Received for publication September 5, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Crop Science Society of America.