Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 27:1105-1108 (1987)
© 1987 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, K. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Frey, K. J.

Honeycomb Design for Selection among Homozygous Oat Lines1

L. D. Robertson and K. J. Frey2

The honeycomb design has been proposed for evaluating the yielding ability of single plants of small grains. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of selection for grain yield via grain, adjusted grain, and biomass yields of single plants grown in a honeycomb design. Materials were 236 F10-derived lines of oats from a broad-based bulk population. They were tested as individual plants in two replicates of the honeycomb design in each of five environments and as lines in a hill-plot experiment with three replicates in each of three environments. Mean yields from the latter experiment were used as the standard for measuring selection effectiveness. Pooled correlations for grain, adjusted grain, and biomass yields of single plants with grain yield of oat lines measured in hill plots were 0.29 ± 0.06, 0.27 ± 0.06, and 0.37 ± 0.06, respectively. With a 10% selection intensity, the actual gain in grain yield (expressed as a percentage of the hill-plot population mean) of oat lines averaged 9.8 ± 0.05, 8.3 ± 0.06, and 11.0 ± 0.05, respectively, when grain, adjusted grain, and biomass yields of single plants were the selection criteria. Discarding of the lowest 10, 25, and 50% of plants for grain, adjusted grain, and biomass resulted in the average retention of 97, 90, and 70%, respectively, of the top decile of oat lines for grain yield. Our results suggest that selecting for grain or biomass yield of oat plants grown in a noncompetitive field arrangement can identify higher yielding oat lines. Selection for biomass gave about one-seventh more gain than did selection for grain yield. Adjustment of grain yield of a plant according to the mean of six neighboring plants in the honeycomb design reduced the predicted gains from selection.

Key Words: Grain yield • Adjusted grain yield • Biomass • Single plant selection • Avena sativa L.


1 Journal Paper no. J-11006 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Economics Exp. Stn., IA 50011. Project 2447,

2 Vicia faba breeder, Int. Ctr. for Agric. Res. in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria; C. F. Curtiss distinguished professor in Agriculture, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011, respectively.

Received for publication April 28, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
E. Traka-Mavrona, D. Georgakis, M. Koutsika-Sotiriou, and T. Pritsa
An Integrated Approach of Breeding and Maintaining an Elite Cultivar of Snap Bean
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 1020 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Crop Science Society of America.