Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 27:548-552 (1987)
© 1987 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vigue, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vigue, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vigue, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. L.

Nitrate Utilization and Dinitrogen Fixation (Acetylene Reduction) by Nitrate Reductase-Defecient Mutants of Pea1

G. T. Vigue and R. L. Warner2

Three NO3 reductase pea (Pisum sativum L.) mutants and the ‘Juneau’ control were evaluated for the ability to absorb and accumulate NO3 from solution, and for growth and N2 fixation (C2H2 reduction) in the presence and absence of NO3. In short-term (20 h) hydroponic studies, the mutants absorbed NO3 at rates similar to Juneau, but accumulated more NO3 than Juneau in both shoots and roots. Seedlings of Juneau assimilated 63%, while seedlings of mutants assimilated <35% of absorbed NO3. In long-term studies with plants grown in vermiculite in the presence of 15 mM NO3, dry weights of mutants A300 and A317 were <50% of Juneau. However, growth of mutant A334, which had only 6 to 8% of the NO3 reductase activity of Juneau, was equal to the control. Growth of mutant A300 was not as rapid as the other genotypes when N2 fixation or NH+4 was the only N source. All three mutants and Juneau exhibited good levels of C2H2 reduction activity and growth in the absence of mineral N. Also, the NO3 reductase mutations did not lessen the inhibition of N2 fixation by NO3 and the cause of the inhibition remains unclear.

Key Words: Nitrate uptake • Nitrate reduction • Nitrate assimilation • Nitrogenase • Nodules • Nodulation • N2 fixation • Pisum sativum L.


1 Scientific Paper no. 7418 College of Agric. Res. Ctr., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA. Project no. 0223, 0336. Scientific paper of the College of Applied Science, Western Illinois Univ., Macomb, IL.

2 Associate professor, Dep. of Agriculture, Western Illinois Univ., Macomb, IL 61455; and professor, Dep. of Agronomy & Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164.

Received for publication June 5, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Crop Science Society of America.