Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 27:31-36 (1987)
© 1987 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bruckner, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frohberg, R. C.

Stress Tolerance and Adaptation in Spring Wheat1

P. L. Bruckner and R. C. Frohberg

Development of stress tolerant cultivars is an objective of many breeding programs, but success has been limited by inadequate screening techniques, and the lack of genotypes that show clear differences in response to well defined environmental stresses. Twenty spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes were evaluated over a range of water and high temperature-stressed environments (15 location-years) to establish standards for evaluation of stress tolerance screening techniques and to characterize genotypic stress tolerance and adaptation to stress environments. Overall and postanthesis stress tolerances were determined using grain yield and kernel weight responses, respectively. Stress tolerances were estimated using stress susceptibility indices (S), grain yields and kernel weights predicted for a hypothetical severe-stress environment from regression parameters, and yields and kernel weights per se in five stress environments. Yield-based stress tolerance estimates were correlated among all estimation methods. The stress susceptibility index identified stress tolerant genotypes that did not have outstanding yield performance per se in stress environments due to low yield potential, but which minimized yield loss under stress conditions. Kernel weightbased estimates of postanthesis stress tolerance using S were not correlated with predicted kernel weights in a hypothetical severestress environment or with kernel weights per se in five stress environments. Genotypes evaluated in this study exhibited a wide range in stress tolerance and adaptation to stress-prone environments. Stress tolerant and susceptible genotypes were identified to use in evaluation of stress tolerance screening techniques. Used in tandem, regression analyses of genotype x environment interactions, stress susceptibility indices, and stress performance per se, provided a more complete description of genotypic stress tolerances than did any analysis used alone.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Genotype x environment interaction • Stress susceptibility index • Stability • Drought stress • Heat stress


1 Contribution from Dep. of Agronomy, Agric. Exp. Stn., Journal article no. 1499, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 581

2 Former graduate research assistant (now, assistant professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Univ. of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793) and professor of agronomy, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105.

Received for publication February 6, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Crop Science Society of America.