Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 27:104-108 (1987)
© 1987 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNew, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNew, R. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by McNew, R. W.

Stability of Harvest Index and Grain Yield in Winter Wheat1

R. C. Sharma, E. L. Smith and R. W. McNew2

Cereal breeders seeking yield improvement have considered that selection for harvest index (HI) might be more effective than selection for yield per se. However, no information is available on the stability of HI across diverse environments. This study was conducted to determine the stability of HI and grain yield and to study the correlation between the 2 in 10 adapted winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. The genotypes were grown in replicated tests at six locations in Oklahoma in each of 2 yr. Two stability parameters were obtained as linear regression coefficient (b) of an entry mean on the average of all entries in each environment and deviations from regression (s2d), and stability was tested with the hypotheses b = 1.0 and s2d = 0. Genotypes differed significantly for HI and grain yield, and significant genotype x environment interactions occurred for both traits. Regression coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 1.46 and 0.75 to 1.17 for HI and grain yield, respectively. Deviations from regression were significant for most genotypes for both traits. On the basis of the estimates of stability parameters, all genotypes were unstable for both traits. Correlation coefficients between HI and grain yield were inconsistent in good and poor environments. This study suggested that both HI and grain yield are significantly affected by environmental changes. Consequently, selection for yield per se might be as effective as selection for HI for improving wheat grain yields in the diverse environments in the Southern Great Plains.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Gnotype x environment interaction • Simple correlation • Linear regression


1 Contribution of the Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Stn. as Journal Article no. J-4898.

2 Research associate, professor of agronomy, and professor of statistics, respectively, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078.

Received for publication November 14, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. E. Engel, D. S. Long, and G. R. Carlson
Predicting Straw Yield of Hard Red Spring Wheat
Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1454 - 1460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Crop Science Society of America.