Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:1230-1235 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moore, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cherney, J. H.

Digestion Kinetics of Sequentially Extracted Cell Wall Components of Forages1

K. J. Moore and J. H. Cherney2

Rate and extent of cell wall digestion are important factors limiting utilization of forages in ruminant diets. The objectives of this experiment were to compare two methods of calculating these parameters and to compare the in vitro digestion kinetics of cell wall, cellulose and hemicellulose sequentially extracted from alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), sorghum x sudangrass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw. Plant tissue was incubated in a rumen fluid-buffer medium for 3,6, 9,12, 24, 36, 48, 72, or 96 h. Cell wall components were extracted sequentially using glass microfiber filters with sintered glass crucibles. The kinetic model used was: C = CDe –k(t-L) + C1; where C = concentration remaining at time t, CD — digestible concentration, k = rate constant, L = discrete lag time, and C1 = indigestible concentration. Parameter estimates were obtained using a In-linear least squares procedure and the multivariate secant nonlinear least squares procedure to determine if one method was more appropriate than the other. Both methods resulted in equations that described the data very well. Predicted and observed values were highly correlated (r > 0.99, P ≤ 0.01), and residual errors were similar for both procedures. There was, however, a bias associated with the nonlinear procedure, which tended to result in lower estimates of k and L when long lag times occurred. Within the grass species, there was no difference (P ≤ 0.05) among rate constants for digestion of cell wall components. Average rate constants for digestion of tall fescue, sorghum x sudangrass, and wheat straw cell wall components were 0.046,0.059, and 0.045 h–1. Rate of digestion of alfalfa hemicellulose was 1.6 times faster than that of cellulose. Rate constants were 0.200 h–1 for alfalfa hemicellulose and 0.125 h–1 for cellulose. The results of this experiment indicate that use of the In-linear calculation procedure is preferable when the digestion kinetics of species with a wide range of lag times are compared. Application of both calculation methods allowed for a comparison of cell wall digestion kinetics in vitro.

Key Words: Rate constant • Extent of digestion • Lag time • Alfalfa • Medicago sativa L. • Tall fescue • Festuca arundinacea Schreb. • Sorghum x sudangrass • Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench • Wheat straw • Triticum aestivum L.


1 Joint contribution from the Univ. of Illinois Agric. Exp. Stn., Urbana, IL 61801 and the Purdue Agric. Exp. Stn., West Lafayette, IN 47907.

2 Assistant professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois and assistant professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., respectively.

Received for publication October 11, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.