Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:1060-1067 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brink, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brink, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Brink, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Marten, G. C.

Barley vs. Oat Companion Crops. I. Forage Yield and Quality Response during Alfalfa Establishment1

G. E. Brink and G. C. Marten2

Oats (Avena sativa L.) is often chosen as a companion crop during the establishment of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Recent research has shown barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) forage to have superior nutrient duality compared to that of oats. Our primary objective was to determine the forage quality and yield potential of representative barley and oat cultivars harvested at various maturity stages as companion crops during alfalfa establishment. Four cultivars each of barley and oats were established with alfalfa at each of two locations during each of 2 yr and harvested initially as forage at each of three small grain crop maturation stages. Alfalfa was also established alone (solo-seeded) with and without herbicides, and was harvested at first flower. In vitro digestible dry matter (IVDDM) concentration of small grain-alfalfa mixtures declined from 83 to 55 dag kg–1 (%) dry wt as companion crop maturation increased from five leaf to dough stage, whereas crude protein (CP) concentration declined from 29 to 9 dag kg–1 dry wt. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentrations increased with maturation until flag leaf stage, and then stabilized through dough stage. Average IVDDM concentration of mixtures of alfalfa and ‘Morex’ barley or ‘Lyon’ oats harvested initially at flag leaf stage was equivalent to or greater than that of solo-seeded alfalfa established with or without herbicides. However, the average NDF and ADF concentrations of solo-seeded alfalfa were lower than those of small grain-alfalfa mixtures. Nutritive value and nutrient yield did not differ between soloseeded alfalfa established with and without herbicides. When barley and oat cultivars were used as companion crops for spring-seeded alfalfa, barley mixtures harvested initially at the five leaf, flag leaf, or dough stage usually provided superior quality forage in the seeding year than did oat mixtures. However, annual IVDDM and CP yields were more influenced by location and year than by small grain species or cultivar.

Key Words: Medicago sativa L. • Avena sativa L. • Hordeum vulgare L. • Solo-seeding • In vitro digestible dry matter • Crude protein • Neutral detergent fiber • Acid detergent fiber


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, and USDA-ARS, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. Paper no. 14070, Scientific Journal Series, Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Former research assistant (presently research agronomist, USDA-ARS, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762); and research agronomist, USDA-ARS and professor of Agronomy, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul.

Received for publication June 7, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.