Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:737-740 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rains, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cox, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rains, D. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cox, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rains, D. W.

Genetic Variation for Nitrogen Assimilation and Translocation in Wheat. III. Nitrogen Translocation in Relation to Grain Yield and Protein1

Michael C. Cox, Calvin O. Qualset and D. William Rains2

Translocation and assimilation of N during grain filling are involved in determining grain protein content in wheat (Trificum aestivum L.). Considerable controversy on the physiological basis for high grain protein concentration exists. These aspects of N movement within the plant were studied in field experiments with the spring wheat cultivars Anza and Cajeme 71 and 96 F5 lines from the cross of these cultivars. Cajeme 71 had higher grain protein concentration, higher translocation, translocation efficiency, and a higher proportion of N in the grain than Anza, but no relationship between any of these three parameters and grain protein concentnation was found in the F5 lines. The ratio of N harvest index to grain harvest index, which gives a rough estimate of the relative proportioning of N and carbohydrate in the grain, was positively related to grain protein concentration (r=0.39 to 0.45, P < 0.01), emphasizing the need to consider both N and carbohydrate partitioning while studying the genetic basis of high grain protein concentration. A relatively simple genetic basis was postulated for the observed variation. A two-gene additive model fit the F5 frequency distribution observed in both low and high N experiments. The F5 lines that assimilated more N after anthesis than required for their yield level, identitied by regression of N assimilation after anthesis on grain yield (Le., high positive residuals), and that had high N translocation were found to be high in grain protein concentration. Excess assimilated N, the sum of translocation and these residuals (positive or negative), was closely related to grain protein concentration (r=0.8 to 0.9, P < 0.01). Further, these data for excess N conform closely to theoretical calculations of the additional N requirement for a 1% increase in grain protein concentration.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Harvest index • Grain protein concentration


1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy and Range Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616. Part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Ph.D. degree.

2 Former graduate student (presently, rice breeder, Queensland Dep. of Primary Industries, P.O. Box 591, Ayr, Qld. 4807, Australia) and professors of agronomy, Univ. of California, Davis, respectively.

Received for publication November 1, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.