Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:691-693 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cantrell, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Haro-Arias, E. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cantrell, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Haro-Arias, E. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cantrell, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Haro-Arias, E. S.

Selection for Spikelet Fertility in a Semidwarf Durum Wheat Population1

R. G. Cantrell and E. S. Haro-Arias2

Genetic variability for spikelet fertility is present in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Divergent selection for spikelet fertility was practiced in a semidwarf durum population derived from a single cross of parents that differ for number of kernels/spikelet to determine the effect of indirect selection for this yield component on grain yield. The group selected for high spikelet fertility exhibited significantly higher numbers of kernels/spikelet and kernels/spike than the random group and the groups selected for low fertility. Selection for spikelet fertility did not result in a significant change in grain yield, but test weight and kernel weight were significantly lower in the groups of families selected for high spikelet fertility. This association of yield components was evident in the phenotypic correlations on the random group of F4 and F5 families where kernels/ spikelet and kernels/spike were negatively associated with kernel weight (r = –0.52 to r = –0.86). Variation for tiller number was limited in the random group of F4s in 1983 and the F5s in 1984. Tiller number was negatively correlated with spikelets/spike in both 1983 (r = –0.45) and 1984 (r = –0.59) but was not associated with yield or other yield components. The lack of yield response from early generation selection for spikelet fertility indicates that the full yield potential of increased sink size via this yield component is difficult to obtain in these North Dakota environments. A selection program should therefore involve some type of simultaneous selection for several yield components or yield per se.

Key Words: Triticum turgidum L. var. durum • Yield components • Kernel weight • Divergent selection


1 Contribution from the Agric. Exp. Stn., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105-5051 as paper no. 1455.

2 Assistant professor of agronomy and former graduate student (currently, maize breeder, CIBA-GEIGY, Guadalajara, Mexico), North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105-5051.

Received for publication September 11, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
A. Collaku and S. A. Harrison
Heritability of Waterlogging Tolerance in Wheat
Crop Sci., February 23, 2005; 45(2): 722 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.