Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:482-488 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berzonsky, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pizzolato, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berzonsky, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pizzolato, T. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berzonsky, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pizzolato, T. D.

Anatomical Characteristics of Three Inbred Lines and Two Maize Synthetics Recurrently selected for High and Low Stalk Crushing Strength1

W. A. Berzonsky, J. A. Hawk and T. D. Pizzolato2

Despite progress in improving maize (Zea mays L.) stalk strength, stalk lodging is still a problem. Identification of traits associated with stalk strength will aid breeders in selecting for lodging resistance and improving maize stalk quality. Anatomical features of stalks of two Missouri synthetic populations (MoSQA and MoSQB) were examined to identify those traits most closely associated with stalk strength. Cycles (C6 low = sixth cycle of selection for low crushing strength, C6 high = sixth cycle of selection for high crushing strength, and C10 high = 10th cycle of selection for high crushing strength) and the original population (C0) of each synthetic were grown 37 064 and 74 129 plants ha-1 at Newark and Georgetown, DE. Stalks of MoSQA had significantly more vascular bundles (C6 low = 338.7, C0 = 375.9, C6 high = 362.7, and C10 high = 368.2) than stalks of MoSQB (C6 low = 281.2, C0 = 304.9, C6 high = 304.4, and C10 high = 317.9). Rind vascular bundles of MoSQA stalks were composed of bundle-sheaths with significantly larger proportional areas (C6 low = 82.54%, C0 = 80.51%, C6 high = 84.05%, and C10 high = 84.34%) than the rind vascular bundle-sheaths of MoSQB stalks (C6 low = 79.79%, C0 = 81.37%, C6 high = 80.81%, and C10 high = 80.79%). Stalks of MoSQB had a significantly larger proportion of hypodermal cell-wall area (C6 low = 76.11%, C0 81.57%, C6 high = 82.33%, and C10 high = 87.42%) compared to stalks of MoSQA (C6 low = 64.32%, C0 = 75.29%, C6 high 72.04%, and C10 high = 75.10%). Anatomical differences between synthetics suggest that MoSQA and MoSQB maintain stalk strength through different struictural compositions. Hypodermal cell-wall area and rind-parenchyma interlumen thickness significantly increased with selection for high crushing strength for both synthetics. The increase in rind-parenchyma interlnmen thickness with selection for high crushing strength is an important consequence of selection given the large area of the maize stalk rind composed of parenchyma cells. Examination of stalk cross-sections of greenhouse-grown-strong, intermediate-strong, and weak-stalk inbred lines (DE811, Wf9, and L317, respectively) revealed anatomical rind component differences. Ear-leaf midrib anatomy reflects rind differences and midribshow promise as a nondestructive selection screen for developing inbred lines and hybrids with stronger stalks to reduce lodging.

Key Words: Zea mays L. • Lodging • Rind strength • Cell wall thickness • Hypodermis • Parenchyma cells • Vascular bundles


1 Published with the approval of the director of the Delaware Agric. Exp. Stn. as Miscellaneous Paper 1080 Contribution 178 of the Dep. of Plant Science.

2 Former research assistant and associate professors, respectively, Dep. of Plant Science, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 1917-1303.

Received for publication March 18, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.