Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:473-478 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Youngs, V. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Youngs, V. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eaton, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Youngs, V. L.

Introgression of Unadapted Germplasm into Adapted Spring Wheat1

D. L. Eaton, R. H. Busch and V. L. Youngs2

The introgression of unadapted germplasm into adapted germplasm is one method of increasing useful genetic variability. In hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) more information on methods of incorporation would be useful, especially for breadmaking quality traits, which are important for cuitivar release. Three populations were developed from two unadapted and three adapted wheat genotypes. The objective was to evaluate the agronomic and breadmaking quality traits of lines derived from types of crosses differing in the amount of unadapted germplasm. The four types of crosses evaluated were single cross, three-way cross, and one and two backcrosses to the adapted parent. Twenty F2-derived lines from each type of cross for each population were evaluated in three field environments. Although the means of the types of crosses did not differ significantly for yield, the mean of lines derived from the single cross were generally lowest and this cross produced the fewest high yielding lines and fewest lines with both high yield and good breadmaking potential. The first backcross and the three-way cross produced similar numbers of high yielding lines. The second backcross produced no more high yielding lines than the first backcross or three-way cross and required an additional generation to develop. Means of types of crosses for quality traits tended to approximate the mean of the parent contributing the largest percentage of germplasm to the cross. Genetic variation for grain yield and wheat protein concentration were similar for most types of crosses, except BC2, which had less variation. The relative proportions of the higher performing parent appeared as important as the type of cross used for development of lines.

Key Words: Genetic variation • Environmental interactions • Triticum aestivum L. • Yield • Protein • Flour extraction • Milling • Water absorption • Mixogram


1 Joint contribution from the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. and the USDA-ARS Journal Series no. 14 424.

2 Former graduate research assistant (now associate scientist, maize program, CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico); research geneticist and professor, USDA-ARS, Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; and research chemist, USDA-ARS, Spring and Durum Wheat Quality Lab., Fargo, ND 58105.

Received for publication June 3, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
M. D. Peel and D. C. Rasmusson
Improvement Strategy for Mature Plant Breeding Programs
Crop Sci., September 1, 2000; 40(5): 1241 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.