Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:233-237 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, R. L.

Cotton Resistance to the Root Knot-Fusarium Wilt Complex. II. Relation to Root-Knot Resistance and its Implications on Breeding for Resistance1

Raymond L. Shepherd2

The fusarium wilt fungus, Fusarium oxysporum Schlect f. vasinfectum [(Atk.) Synd.& Hans.], and the root-knot nematode (RKN) [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood] cause a destructive disease complex in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). This study was conducted to determine the range of genetic resistance to RKN in a group of 18 cotton cultivars and breeding lines, to evaluate the relationship between genes for resistance to fusarium wilt disease (FW) and the genes for RKN resistance, and to ascertain the relative importance of the two types of resistance in controlling FW. Numbers of RKN eggs produced on the cottons ranged from <1000/plant on Auburn 623 RNR to >148 000/plant on ‘Rowden’. One-eighth as many and 18 times more RKN eggs/plant were produced on Auburn 623 RNR and Rowden in 40 days, respectively, than were used to inoculate them. No commercial cultivar was resistance to RKN in this study. Two cotton cultivars expressed genetic resistance that provided moderate field resistance to FW independently of RKN resistance. Differences in resistance to FW in the field among cotton cultivars and breeding lines were determined more by RKN resistance than by genetic resistance to FW. Results indicate that cotton can be developed with genetic resistance to FW independently of RKN resistance and that this genetic resistance probably would provide moderate field resistance to FW. High field resistance to the RKN-FW complex depends on high RKN resistance, and cotton cultivars with high RKN resistance probably would have adequate field resistance to this complex even if they were genetically susceptible to FW.

Key Words: Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood • Gossypium hirsutum L. • Fusarium oxysporum Schlect f. vasinfectum (Atk.) Synd & Hans. • Screening for resistance


1 Contribution of the USDA-ARS, Crop Science Res. Lab., Mississippi State, MS3 9762, and the Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn University, AL 36849

2 Research agronomist, USDA-ARS, Mississippi State, MS 39762-5367.

Received for publication April 10, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.