Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:223-228 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R.
Right arrow Articles by Meredith, W. R.

Normal vs. Okra Leaf Yield Interactions in Cotton. II. Analysis of Vegetative and Reproductive Growth1

Randy Wells and William R. Meredith, Jr.2

Past studies on differences in growth between Okra(L2°,L2°) and normal (broad-leaved l2l2) cottons (Gossypium hirsutum L.) have routinely used Okra lines derived from backcrossing the Okra leaf trait into established cultivars. In the current study, we compared plant growth and fiber yield among near-isogenic lines of Okra and normal selected from bulked heterozygous populations derived from two sets of contrasting crosses. Four paired near-isogenic Okra leaf and normal leaf lines were planted in replicated trials on two planting dates in 1983 at Stoneville, MS Two strains had superior lint yield by the normal leaf sib while two others had superior lint yield by the Okras sib. ‘Stoneville 213’( STV 213), the Okra leaf cultivar produced by conventional backcrossing, served as the control wherein the normal leaf has been superior in yield compared to the Okra leaf. Except for plant height, the parameters of vegetative and reproductive growth showed no significant leaf type x strain, or leaf type x strain x harvest date interactions. The Okra leaf entries produced maximal leaf area indices that were 26 and 49% smaller than those produced by the normal leaf entries for the April and May plantings, respectively. This disparity was partially offset by the production of more leaves by the Okra entries in the early planting, but not in the late planting. the number of squares and flowers produced by the Okra leaf entries indicates a greater fruiting potential than was realized. The percentage of bolls that was shed was closely associated with the maximal number of immature bolls produced. We concluded that the Okra leaf cottons can produce plant canopies competitive in yield with those of broad-leaved cottons. The maximum potential of cottons with Okra leaves remains unclear, because of the large leaf type x environment interactions.

Key Words: Gossypium hirsutum L. • Vegetative growth • Reproductive growth • Yield components • light penetration • Leaf area • Genotype x environment interaction


1 Contribution from USDA-ARS, cotton Physiology and Genetics Res. Unit, Stoneville, MS 88776. Published as Journal paper no. 5987 of the Mississippi Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn.

2 Plant physiologist and research geneticist, respectively, USDA-ARS, Cotton Physiology and Genetics Res. Unit, Jamie Whitten Delta States Res. Ctr., Stoneville, MS.

Received for publication February 11, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. J. Burke
Evaluation of Source Leaf Responses to Water-Deficit Stresses in Cotton Using a Novel Stress Bioassay
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 108 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.