Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 26:93-95 (1986)
© 1986 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dearing, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dearing, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dearing, L.

Performance of Cottons when Infested with Tobacco Budworm1

Johnie N. Jenkins, W. L. Parrott, J. C. McCarty and Lee Dearing2

Thirteen germplasm lines of cotton, Gossypiumh irsutum L., including seven cultivars were grown for 3 years with and without tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens F. There is a paucity of information available on the performance of cotton germplasm when grown under tobacco budworm infestation. Development of insecticide resistance in this insect or a loss of effective insecticides from the market would pose substantial problems for the cotton industry. Objectives of this study were i) to determine the performance of 13 diverse germplasm lines when grown under controlled, uniform levels of tobacco budworm infestation, ii) to identify germplasm useful to breedersf or use in developing cultivars resistant to tobacco budworm, iii) to identify germplasm lines with different levels of resistance useful for studies on how or why cotton germplasm resist tobacco budworm and iv) to develop information useful for improving breeding practices in cotton. Plots were grown on a Leeper silty clay loam, fine montmorilloritic, non-acid, thermic, chromondertic, Haplaquept, 0 to 2%s lope. Infested plots were inoculated with first instar tobacco budwormla rvae five to six times at weekly intervals beginning about the second week of squaring as determinedi n ‘Stoneville 213’. Worm-free plots were sprayed weekly with fenvalerate [cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methy4-chloroalpha-(l-methylethyl)benzeneacetate]. Resistance was measured as the ability to resist yield loss when continually infested with tobacco budworm larvae for 5 to 6 weeks. Resistance was identified in ‘Stoneville 506’ and confirmed in PEE DEE 875, PEE DEE 8619 and ‘Tamcot CAMD-E’. Because two are cultivars and are presently being grown, information on them can immediately be put to use. Each of the four germplasms should be useful to breeders as parental lines to increase resistance to tobacco budworm. Regression analyses on one year's data suggest that about 65% of the resistance is associated with early, rapid fruiting. However, additional unidentified factors are also involved.

Key Words: Heliothis virescens F. • H. zea (Boddie) • Plant resistance • Cotton genetics • Cotton breeding • Gossypium hirsutum L.


1 Contribution of the USDAA RS, Crop Science Research Laboratory and Mississippi Agric. and Forestry Exp. Stn. Paper no. 6159. Part of data was used in Masters thesis of Lee Dearing.

2 Research geneticist, research entomologist, research agronomist and former graduate student, respectively, USDA-ARS, Crop Science Res. Lab., P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762.

Received for publication March 28, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Crop Science Society of America.