Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:967-970 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boerma, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Boerma, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, S. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Boerma, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, S. A.

Sampling Variation and Resource Allocation in Soybean Canopy Photosynthesis Experiments1

H. R. Boerma, D. A. Ashley and S. A. Harrison2

Canopy apparent photosynthesis (CAP) during the seed-fill period has been shown to be related to seed yield in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. The current techniques for measuring CAP are labor intensive and time consuming. However, estimates of error variances, coefficients of variation, and genotype x environment (G x E) interaction variances have not been reported. This report describes these statistics from three field experiments conducted over 5 years. These statistics were used to calculate the number of CAP measurements (replications x measurement dates) per genotype per environment and the number of environments required to detect various levels of differences between two genotypes. There were no differences in the error variances or CVs in F3– and F6–derived lines. The average error variance was 7.14 (µmol CO2 m–2 s–1) and the average CV was 0.179 for our 16 measurement dates. Assuming no G x E interaction and ß = 0.5 (probability of Type II error), it would require 2, 4, 7, and 28 replications with one measurement date to detect 40, 30, 20, and 10% differences, respectively, between genotypes. In two of our three experiments there were significant ({alpha} < 0.05) G x E interactions. The G x E variance components were 0.1 and 0.2 of the error variance based on a single measurement date in these two experiments. Even with the largest amount of G x E interaction present in our experiments, a 20% difference between two genotypes can be detected with four environments and a 30% difference with two environments if four CAP measurements (two measurements x two replications) per genotype per environment are made. These results are discussed in regard to efficient design of experiments to determine CAP.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Error variances • Coefficient of variation • Statistics • Genotypic differences


1 Contribution of the Dep of Agronomy Univ of Georgia Athens, GA 30602. This research was supported by state and Hatch funds allocated to the Georgia Agric. Exp. Sm., the Georgia Agric. Commodity Commission for Soybeans, and by USDA/SEA under Grants from CSRS.

2 Professors of agronomy, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 and assistant professor of agronomy, Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Ctr., Baton Rouge, LA 70893, respectively.

Received for publication November 21, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.