Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:964-966 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stuthman, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stuthman, D. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Meyers, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stuthman, D. D.

Agronomic Comparison of Dwarf and Conventional Height Oat Genotypes1

Kenneth B. Meyers, Steve R. Simmons and Deon D. Stuthman2

Development of dwarf stature cultivars has contributed to higher grain yields in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Although dwarf stature oat (Arena sativa L.) germplasm is available, most oat breeders have not used it in the past because straw yield has traditionally been considered an important agronomic trait. Comparisons of the agronomic performance of dwarf and conventional height genotypes are needed in order to better define the potential value of incorporating dwarf stature into future oat cultivars. From 1982 to 1984 at St. Paul, MN, four experimental dwarf oat genotypes (MN 795929, MN 805928, MN 81160 and MN 82214) were compared with four conventional height genotypes (‘Moore’, ‘Goodland’, ‘Ogle’, and MN 80116) for grain and straw yields, as well as other agronomic characteristics. Plant populations for these studies ranged from 210 to 480 plants m–2. The 1984 experiment was conducted under especially high nitrogen fertilization. There were no differences in grain yield between the dwarfs and conventional height genotypes in 1982 and 1983. The highest yielding dwarf genotype in 1984 produced significantly less grain than the best conventional cultivar. Overall, straw yields of the dwarfs ranged from 73 to 125% of the conventional height lines. However, the highest grain yielding dwarfs in each year had straw yields only about 80 to 90% as high as the highest grain yielding conventional cuitivars. These proportional straw yield differences existed whether the crop was harvested at ground level or at a 15 cm stubble height. Harvest indexes for the highest yielding dwarfs were similar to the conventional height genotypes, even though the dwarfs were about 30% shorter in stature. Panicles of the dwarfs characteristically exserted only partially from the flag leaf sheaths, although this characteristic is being corrected through additional breeding. Such future dwarf lines should be well adapted to intensive management conditions because of their resistance to lodging and may ultimately provide higher grain productivities than can be achieved with conventional height cultivars.

Key Words: Avena sativa L. • Seeding rate • Plant population • Harvest index • Shoot survival • Straw yield


1 Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. Paper no. 14136, Scientific Journal Series.

2 Former undergraduate student, associate professor, and professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

Received for publication October 1, 1984.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
S. C. K. Milach, H. W. Rines, and R. L. Phillips
Plant Height Components and Gibberellic Acid Response of Oat Dwarf Lines
Crop Sci., July 1, 2002; 42(4): 1147 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.