Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:1007-1010 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morris, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G. M.

Development of Hard Winter Wheat after Anthesis as Affected by Nitrogen Nutrition1

Craig F. Morris and Gary M. Paulsen2

Post-anthesis nitrogen nutrition should be an important determinant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield because remobilization of vegetative N for grain filling is associated with decreasing photosynthetic activity of leaves. Experimental evidence is contradictory, however. Research was conducted to reconcile different findings on the importance of N nutrition of wheat during grain development and to understand the inverse grain yield/N concentration relationship. Five winter wheat genotypes were grown in sand with nutrient solution in a glasshouse. Two N regimes were imposed at the early boot stage (Feekes scale 9) by continuing the complete nutrient solution by leaching nutrients and supplying solution devoid of N until plants were mature. Plants were harvested 10, 20, or 40 days after anthesis and analyzed for grain and vegetative yields, yield components, and grain and vegetative N concentrations. High N nutrition increased mean biological dry matter yield and grain yield 20 and 40 days after anthesis. Grain yield was significantly correlated with number of spikes per plant, kernels per plant, kernels per spike, and kernel weight. Fertile spikes per plant were affected most by N nutrition, but grain growth rates per plant and per kernel also occasionally increased. Grain N concentration remained nearly constant under low N nutrition, but increased between the first and last samplings under high N nutrition. Vegetative N content wits also nearly constant under high N nutrition, but decreased under low N nutrition as grain filling progressed. We concluded Ihat ample levels of N during late developmental stages are necessary for maximum yields of high-protein grain.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Nutrient culture • Grain protein • Grain yield • Yield components


1 Contribution no. 85-179-J, Dep. of Agronomy, Agric. Exp. Stn., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506.

2 Graduate research assistant and professor of agronomy, respectively.

Received for publication December 7, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.