Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:870-876 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ketring, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ketring, D. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, P. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ketring, D. L.

Evaluation of Peanut Genotypes for Resistance to Water Stress In Situ1

P. I. Erickson and D. L. Ketring2

Observations indicate that Spanish-type peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are more tolerant of dehydration than Virginia types under severe water stress. However, physiological reasons for differences in tolerance to water deficits among peanut genotypes have not been established. The objective of this study was to evaluate peanut genotypes for their response and relative resistance to severe water deficits. A Spanish type (‘Comet’), Virginia type (‘Florunner’), and a Spanish x Virginia selection (OK-FH15) were grown in situ under irrigated (IRR) and rainfed (RF) conditions. Leaf water potential ({psi}w), osmotic potential ({psi}{pi}), turgor potential ({psi}p), relative water content (RWC) and its apoplastic water fraction (Aw) were determined weekly between 1300 and 1500 h, and diurnally on selected days. Yields were determined at 149 days after planting (DAP). Ratios (RF/IRR) genotype {psi}w, {psi}{pi}, and RWC showed significant differences among genotypes between 50 and 63 DAP, a critical period of peanut growth and development. The {psi}w and RWC ratios were maximum for all genotypes at 63 and 70 DAP, respectively. The maximum {psi}{pi} ratio occurred on 56 DAP for Comet (1.25), 63 DAP for OK-FH15 (1.32), and 70 DAP for Florunner (1.18). Regression analysis of 1/{psi}w vs. RWC showed a biphasic cubic polynomial function best fit the data for all genotypes. The data indicated that as RWC declined, Comet {psi}w tended to decrease more rapidly than either OK-FH15 or Florunner. Conservative estimates of {psi}{pi}, changes between 95 and 55%R WC were highest for Comet, lowest for Florunner, and OK-FH15 was intermediate. Aw was calculated for each genotype and plotted against {psi}p to determine its contribution to hydration maintenance. At high {psi}p, maximum Aw, was 7.1, 12.1, and 25.2%f or Florunner, OK-FH15, and Comet, respectively. Florunner Aw, decreased to zero at 0.16 MPa {psi}p, and the Aw of OK-FH15 decreased with {psi}p to the origin. Comet had much greater Aw at low {psi}p and was the only genotype with appreciable Aw at zero {psi}p. These results indicate that Aw varies in peanuts and may be genotype specific. Comet showed significantly higher yield, grade, and dollar value than either Florunner or OK-FH15 under rainfed conditions. The lower {psi}w, greater change in {psi}{pi}, and higher Aw and yield of RF Comet suggests greater resistance to dehydration when high soil moisture deficits and evaporative demand conditions occur.

Key Words: Arachis hypogaea L. • Dehydration resistance • Water relations • Osmotic adjustment • Apoplastic water • Hydration maintenance • Irrigation • Rainfed


1 Cooperative investigations of the Southern Plains Area, USDA-ARS, and the Agric. Exp. Sin., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078.

2 Formerly, research associate, present address: FMCC orporation, Princeton, NJ 08540; and plant physiologist, USDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Laboratory, Stillwater, OK 74076.

Received for publication September 13, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.