Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:736-739 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Adjadi, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singh, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Adjadi, O.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singh, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Adjadi, O.

Bruchid Resistance in Cowpea1

B. B. Singh, S. R. Singh and O. Adjadi2

The most damaging storage pest in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] is Callosobruchus maculatus (F.), commonly known bruchid. Therefore, concerted efforts are being made at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) to develop bruchid-resistant cowpea varieties. By systematic screening of over 8000 germplasm lines, three sources of resistance m cowpea bruchid have been identified: TVu 2027, TVu 11952, and TVu 11953. Screening for bruchid resistance was done by placing 10 seeds of each variety in separate plastic boxes of 5 x 5 x 2 cm dimensions and infesting with two pairs of bruchids to lay eggs for 15 h. The boxes were then incubated at 27 to 28 °C and 70% relative humidity. The total number of eggs laid in each box was determined and a daily count of emerging adults was made until 50 days after infestation. Percent adult emergence was computed based on number of eggs and total adults emerged. Bulk-sample bioassay was done by infesting 200-g samples of each line with two pairs of bruchids in a 500-mL jars with perforated caps. A 100-seed sample was taken at various intervals up to 180 days and data on percent damaged seeds, number of exit holes and dry weight loss were recorded. Bioassay of these lines revealed delayed, staggered, and significantly less adult emergence as compared to the susceptible cv. Ife Brown. The average adult emergence in TVu 2027, TVu 11952, and TVu 11953 was 26.6, 32.8, and 22.1%, respectively, as compared to 86.4% for Ife Brown. Similarly, the percent damaged seeds ranged from 25 t.o 26% in the resistant lines at 103 days after infestation as compared to 95% for Ife Brown. The differences among resistant lines were not significant indicating that the level of resistance in these lines is similar. The data further indicate that the level of resistance in these lines is good enough to provide reasonable protection against bruchids during storage.

Key Words: Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp • Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) • Storage pest


1 Contribution from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road, PMB 4320, Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal Series no. 287.

2 Cowpea breeder director, Grain Legume Improvement Program, and former graduate student, respectively.

Received for publication August 6, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.