Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:567-569 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viands, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Teuber, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Viands, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Teuber, L. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Viands, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Teuber, L. R.

Fall Dormancy of Alfalfa in Transplanted vs. Direct-Seeded Nurseries1

D. R. Viands and L. R. Teuber2

Fall dormancy of alfalfa cultivars and experimental synthetics is routinely evaluated by breeders to predict winterhardiness. Some researchers establish evaluation nurseries by direct-seeding, followed by thinning the seedlings. Other researchers start seedlings in the greenhouse and transplant them to the field at the desired spacing. Transplants usually have highly branched root systems, whereas direct-seeded plants primarily have a taprooted system. Because of these different types of root systems, transplanted and direct-seeded plan~s were compared for fall dormancy by two experiments, one with 17 cultivars and the other with nine cultivars. Each cultivar was established by both transplanting and direct-seeding in the spring. Fall dormancy of individual plants was rated according to plant height about 5 weeks after the last forage harvest (harvested 7 September). Correlation coefficients between transplant methods (r = 0.99, P<0.01 and r = 0.96, P<0.01 for fire two experiments) and non significant establishment method x cultivar interactions clearly demonstrated that either method provides reliable fall dormancy evaluation of synthetics.

Key Words: Medicago sativa L. • Root types • Winterhardiness


1 Joint contribution of the Dep. of Plant Breeding and Biometry, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell Univ., and the Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California, Davis. Plant Breeding Series Paper No. 733.

2 Assistant Professor, Dep. of Plant Breeding and Biometry, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853, and assistant professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Range Science, Univ. of California. Davis, CA 95616, respectively.

Received for publication July 16, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.