Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:556-560 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frederickson, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kronstad, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frederickson, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kronstad, W. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Frederickson, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kronstad, W. E.

A Comparison of Intermating and Selfing Following Selection for Heading Date in Two Diverse Winter Wheat Crosses1

L. J. Frederickson and W. E. Kronstad2

Response to two cycles of mass selection for heading date involving selfing or intermating was studied in two diverse winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) crosses (I and II). Selection was bidirectional resulting in early and late-heading populations for each mating system, cycle and cross. Generation means and variances within crosses were used in a genetic analysis of heading date. Additive effects of genes were an important source of variation in Cross I. Predicted response to selection for heading date was 7.1 and 9.1 days/cycle for 1981 and 1982, respectively. Heading date in Cross II was affected primarily by non-additive genetic effects. For this cross, progress from selection for heading date was predicted to be 6.9 days/cycle in 1981, and 1.4 days/cycle in 1982. Observed response to bidirectional selection for heading date in Cross I showed gains of –4.8 and 5.5 days/cycle with selfing and –4.2 and 5.1 days/cycle with intermating in 1982. Response to selection for heading date with intermating in Cross II was superior to selfing for earlier heading date (6.0 vs. 5.0 days/cycle) and inferior to selfing for later heading date (0.9 vs. 1.9 days/cycle) in 1982. The latter results were ascribed to an accumulation of minor genes by intermating and rapid fixation of recessive genes due to selfing, for early and late selection, respectively. Recurrent selection with intermating was not more efficient in changing the heading dates of the two populations than selection followed by selfing. The effect of bidirectional selection for heading date under two systems of mating on seven other traits was also studied. Selection for early heading date under both systems of mating in Crosses I and II resulted in shorter plant stature, fewer spikes/plant, and lower biological yield (P = 0.05) at two locations in 1982. Bidirectional selection for heading date under both mating systems had no significant effect on grain yield, 100-kernel weight, kernels/spike, and harvest index in Crosses I and II.

Key Words: Additive gene effects • Genetic correlation • Generation means • Non-additive gene effects • Systems of mating


1 Technical Paper no. 6959 Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn. at Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.

2 Former graduate research assistant, now research station manager with Cargill Research, St. Peter, MN 56082 and professor, Oregon State Univ., respectively.

Received for publication September 15, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.