Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:283-288 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brun, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brun, W. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brun, W. A.

Effect of the Reproductive Sink on 14C-Assimilate Partitioning between Starch and Water-Soluble Compounds in Soybean Leaves1

Dale R. Carlson and William A. Brun2

The objective of this study was to determine if changes in reproductive sink demand influence the partitioning of carbon within the source leaf. Temporary (Late R2-R4) and continuous (Late R2-R8) light and CO2 enrichment treatments were used increase the pod number and weight on field.grown soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr. ‘Hodgson 78’). During the last week of the temporary treatment, and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks thereafter, plants were pulse-labeled with 144CO2 at the tenth trifoliolate leaf. Leaf discs were removed at 0.5, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after labeling and subsequently extracted for determination of 14C in the starch, water-soluble compounds (WSC), and residual fractions. Temporary and continuous CO2 and light enrichment increased the reproductive sink load of field.grown soybeans at all sampling dates. On the average, total number of pods was increased 35% by light enrichment, and 38% by CO2 enrichment. During this same period, light enrichment res~resulted in at least a 38% increase in total pod wall and seed dry weight while CO2 enrichment resulted in a 28% increase. Light and CO2 enrichment increased plant size during the sampling period. Leaf dry weight was increased 30% by light enrichment, and 39% by CO2 enrichment. Stem plus petiole dry weight was increased 26% by light enrichment and 51% by CO2 enrichment. Hence, light enrichment had a greater effect on reproductive than on vegetative growth, while CO2 enrichment had a greater effect on vegetative than on reproductive growth. On the first sampling date, 11 August, significantly less label was incorporated and retained as starch in the light-enriched plants. No differences were observed in the levels of 14C-labeled WSC or starch for the light-enriched plants on 18 and 25 August, and during the entire experiment for the CO2-enriched plants. On 7 September, 4 weeks after removal of the temporary treatment, significantly less label was retained as WSC, starch, and residual material in the light-enriched plants. The hypothesis that increased sink demand may influence assimilate partitioning is supported by these data.

Key Words: Glycine max L. Merr. • Total nonstructural carbohydrates • Water-soluble compounds • Light enrichment • CO2 enrichment • Starch


1 This research was supported in part by a grant from the Minnesota Soybean Res. and-Promotion Coun:, and also in part by the USDA-ARS under Grant 82 CRCR-l-1077 from the Competitive Research Grants Office. Contribution from the Univ. of Minnesota Agric. Exp. St, Paper no. 13,935, Scientific Journal Series.

2 Research assistant (currently senior research biologist, Monsanto Agric. Products Co., St. Louis. MO./63167) and professor of agronomy and plant genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.

Received for publication May 14, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.