Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:63-65 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Burton, G. W.

Spaced-Plant-Population-Progress Test1

Glenn W. Burton2

This paper describes a precise and efficient method of measuring the progress realized and expected in a population improvement breeding program. The spaced-plant-population-progress (SPPP) test described here included 100 spaced plant progenies of each entry arranged in 100 blocks with one plant of each entry per block. Analysis of variance of the first-year spaced-plant yield data from two tests of Pensacola bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum var. saure Parodi) populations being improved by recurrent restricted phenotypic selection (RRPS) gave significant (P = 0.05) mean differences among selection cycles for all but one entry comparison. The SPPP test also supplied variances and coefficients of variation (CVs) for each population that served as relative indices of the variability left in each population and the progress that might be expected from the next cycle of selection. In a precise seeded plot test, relative first-year mean yields of the F1 hybrid of clones 2 x 4 (from Cycle 4) and Cycle 9 compared with the commercial check were 167 and 175%, respectively, and were not different (P = 0.05). In the SPPP test, their respective relative mean yields, 226 and 267%, were different (P = 0.01). Likewise, the difference between mean yields of Cycles 8 and 9 that was significant (P = 0.05) with the SPPP test was not significant in the replicated seeded plot test. The SPPP test gives valid relative yields but over estimates the yield potential of a population that will be grown in solid stands established from seed. Samples of 50 or 25 plants compared in SPPP tests gave more variable mean yields and larger variances than the 100-plant populations.

Key Words: Recurrent restricted phenotypic selection (RRPS) • Mass selection • Bahiagrass • Paspalum notatum var. saure Parodi


1 Cooperative investigations of the USDA-ARS and the Univ. of Georgia, College of Agric. Exp. Stns., Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Agronomy Dep., Tifton, GA 31793.

2 Research geneticist, USDA-ARS, and the Univ. of Georgia, College of Agric. Exp. Stns., Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Agronomy Dep., Tifton, GA 31793.

Received for publication November 29, 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. L. Waldron, J. G. Robins, M. D. Peel, and K. B. Jensen
Predicted Efficiency of Spaced-Plant Selection to Indirectly Improve Tall Fescue Sward Yield and Quality
Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 443 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.