Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:52-58 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cure, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Robarge, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cure, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Robarge, W. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cure, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Robarge, W. P.

Dinitrogen Fixation in Soybean in Response to Leaf Water Stress and Seed Growth Rate1

Jennifer D. Cure, C. David Raper, Jr., Robert P. Patterson and Wayne P. Robarge2

Late season declines in N2 fixation by soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] frequently are observed under field conditions but do not always occur under glasshouse and growth chamber culture where water stress is avoided and photoperiod is manipulated to alter rate of seed growth. To evaluate the effects of water stress and photoperiod during reproductive growth on declines in N2-fixation, nodulated ‘Ransom’ soybeans dependent entirely on N2-fixation and growing under controlled environment conditions were divided into two groups at the beginning seed (RS) stage. At R5, photoperiod was utilized to experimentally alter the rate of seed growth as a sink for photosynthate and N by imposing a short-day photoperiod (SD) on half of the plants and a long-day photoperiod (LD) on the other half. Within each photoperiod treatment, half of the plants were subjected to a single episode of leaf water stress between –1.2 and –1.8 MPa at the full seed (R6) stage, and half served as nonstressed controls. Plants were sampled at 1o to 5-day intervals between R5 and full maturity (R8) stages and analyzed for N and total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC). The rate of N accumulation from N2-fixation declined during reproductive growth for the stressed plants but not for the nonstressed plants. Thus, a water stress can actuate a late season decline in N2-fixation. When rate of seed growth was slowed under LD, N composition in leaves remained higher following water stress than when a faster rate of seed growth was promoted under SD. Dinitrogen-fixation activity and dry matter production recovered after rewatering for stressed plants under LD but not under SD. Concentration of TNC in leavlets was greater under LD for both stressed and nonstressed plants. Thus, concentration of TNC in leaflets does not appear to be as important in recovery from water stress as concentration of N.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Nonstructural carbohydrate • Photoperiod • Photosynthesis • Source/sink relationships


1 Paper 9024 of the journal series of the North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv., Raleigh, NC 27695. Research reported in this paper was supported in part by Am. Soybean Assoc. Research Foundation Grant ASARF80403 and by, a grant from the North Carolina Soybean Producers Assoc.

2 Research scientist, Dep. Botany, Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706; professor, Dep. Soil Science; professor, Dep. Crop Science; and assistant professor, Dep. Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7619.

Received for publication October 31, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.