Crop Science Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 25:162-167 (1985)
© 1985 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulitze, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mulitze, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mulitze, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. J.

Genotype Assay and Method of Moments Analyses of Five Quantitative Traits in a Spring Wheat Cross1

D. K. Mulitze and R. J. Baker2

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the genotype assay procedure for estimating the number of genes governing quantitative traits. For comparison, numbers of genes were also estimated by applying the method of moments procedure to the same material. The genotype assay and method of moments procedures were used to estimate the number of genes controlling differences in spikelets/spike, kernels/spike, kernel weight, grinding time, and culm length between the spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar Cook and line NB125. A modified split-plot field experiment with 176 F5-derived families was conducted in each of 2 years at one location. Genotype assay analysis gave estimates of numbers of genes of 3 to 24+, 2 to 8, 2 to 8, 1 to 6, and 3 to 17 controlling spikelets/spike, kernels/spike, kernel weight, grinding time, and culm length, respectively. The method of moments gave estimates of 2 to 7, 4 to 7, 3 to 8, 2 to 9, and 6 to 10 for the same traits. Genotype-environment interaction contributed to variation in estimates from both methods. Genotype assay was sensitive to the level of Type I error used to test for variation among grandprogeny lines while the method of moments analysis was sensitive to the method used for estimating genotypic range. A general equation for estimating gene number by the method of moments from any generation within a cross of two inbred lines was developed. The advantages of using the method of moments in later generations was discussed. The method of moments applied to later generations may often be superior to genotype assay for estimating the number of genes affecting a quantitative trait.

Key Words: Quantitative genetics • Number of genes • Triticum aestivum L.


1 Contribution of the Crop Develop. Ctr., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 0W0. Part of a Ph.D. diss. submitted by the senior author.

2 Former graduate research assistant (currently post-doctoral fellow, Int. Ctr. for Agric. Res. in the Dry Areas, ICARDA, P.O. Box 5466, Aleppo, Syria), and senior research scientist in the Crop Develop. Ctr., respectively.

Received for publication April 26, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Crop Science Society of America.