Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:957-962 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Croy, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Croy, L. I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Croy, L. I.

Osmotic Adjustment and Solute Accumulation in Two Wheat Genotypes Differing in Drought Resistance1

R. C. Johnson, H. T. Nguyen and L. I. Croy2

Field observations have indicated that the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cv. TAM W-101 is relatively drought resistant compared with the cv. Sturdy. In a growth chamber experiment, osmotic adjustment and various solutes potentially involved in osmotic adjustment were measured in leaves of TAM W-101 and Sturdy. Plants were grown in sand culture for 28 days at 20°C with 16 h light per day (=600 µmol m-2 s-1). Stress treatments were then imposed by limiting water in pots for 14 days, after which water relations were determined with pressure-volume curves on leaves of stressed plants following overnight hydration (prestressed), and on hydrated unstresssed plant leaves. Leaf solutes measured were total amino acids, proline, free sugars, and K. Prestressed leaves of both cultivars had significantly lower solute potential at full turgor ({Psi}fs) and zero turgor ({Psi}os) than unstressed leaves, indicating osmotic adjustment. But prestressed TAM W-101 apparently adjusted more, with significantly lower values for {Psi}fs (–1.61 MPa) and {Psi}os (–2.44 MPa) compared to prestressed Sturdy (–1.40 and –1.98 MPa, respectively). The relative reduction of dry matter produced in prestressed TAM W-101 plants did not, however, differ from prestressed Sturdy plants. Water use efficiency (WUE, mg total dry matter/g H2O lost per pot) was significantly lower in TAM W-101 (2.27) than in Sturdy (2.55) and in prestressed (1.81) than unstressed (2.40) leaves. Tissue elasticity was also lower in TAM W-101 than Sturdy and lower in prestressed than unstressed leaves. Nonreducing sugars increased from 15 g/kg dry wt in unstressed to 39 g/kg dry wt in prestressed (1.4%) leaves, but reducing sugars did not differ among treatments. Only amino acids, including proline, were greater in prestressed TAM W-101 than Sturdy leaves. But calculated as ideal osmotica, amino acid concentrations were too low to explain the difference in {Psi}fs between prestressed cultivars. As the adaptive significance of the cultivar differences in osmotic adjustment, WUE, and tissue elasticity are clarified, selection for these factors to improve wheat drought resistance may be possible.

Key Words: Triticum aestivum L. • Water deficits • Proline • Amino acids • Carbohydrates • Water potential • Water use efficiency


1 Journal article 4381 of the Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Stn.

2 Assistant professors and professor of Agronomy, respectively. Dep. Agronomy, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078.

Received for publication August 26, 1983.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. W. Wall, R. L. Garcia, B. A. Kimball, D. J. Hunsaker, P. J. Pinter Jr., S. P. Long, C. P. Osborne, D. L. Hendrix, F. Wechsung, G. Wechsung, et al.
Interactive Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Drought on Wheat
Agron. J., March 2, 2006; 98(2): 354 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.