Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:791-793 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Widstrom, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by McMillian, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Widstrom, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by McMillian, W. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Widstrom, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by McMillian, W. W.

Patterns of Resistance in Sorghum to the Sorghum Midge1

N. W. Widstrom, B. R. Wiseman and W. W. McMillian2

The sources of resistance to midge, Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillett), in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] have a need to be characterized so that different types may be consolidated and/or integrated into an effective selection program. Two separate sets of sorghum parents, F2, F3, and selfed backcross generations, (F12PF1)S and (F1P2)S, were grown on a Tifton sandy (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Plinthic Paleudult) in five-replicate field experiments in 1971 and evaluated for resistance to sorghum midge. No simple inheritance pattern was evident, but the resistance of sorghum line SGIRL-MR-1 was determined to be inherited as primarily recessive. F2 progenies from nine crosses and their reciprocals were grown in replicated tests in two or more years during 1979–1981. Results revealed significant differences in resistance to the sorghum midge between progeny of reciprocal crosses. The resistance of the lines PI383856 and SGIRL-MR-1 seemed to be inherited differently. The resistance in PI383856 tended to diminish in crossbred progenies when the line was used as a female and resistance in all SGIRL-MR-1 crosses tended to be recessive. Therefore, PI383856 or SGIRL-MR-1 should have utility in breeding for resistance by alternate crossing or backcrossing and selfing during selection. Resistance in PI383856 and SGIRL-MR-1 should be combined into a common source that might be more stable and have a higher level of resistance to sorghum midge damage than either line alone.

Key Words: Host plant resistance • Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench • Contarinia sorghicola Coquillett • Reciprocal differences


1 Contribution of the USDA-ARS in cooperation with the Univ. of Georgia College of Agric. Exp. Stns., Coastal Plain Stn., Tifton, GA.

2 Research, geneticist and research entomologists, Southern Grain Insects Res. Lab., USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA 31793. Reprints purchased by USDA for official use only.

Received for publication October 3, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.