Crop Science Grow Your Career with CSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Crop Sci 24:774-779 (1984)
© 1984 Crop Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dassou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kueneman, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dassou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kueneman, E. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dassou, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kueneman, E. A.

Screening Methodology for Resistance to Field Weathering of Soybean Seed1

S. Dassou and E. A. Kueneman2

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seeds may lose vigor prior to harvest, especially when grown in humid, tropical environments. This study compared three seed weathering treatments to identify soybean genotypes with resistance to field weathering of seed. Thirty-five genotypes were planted in replicated trials on three dates and subjected to 1) field weathering (seeds were harvested 3 weeks after physiological maturity), 2) incubator weathering (pods at physiological maturity were detached from the plant and kept at 30°C and 90 to 95% relative humidity for 10 days), and 3) wet-bag weathering (plants at physiological maturity were placed in wet burlap bags for 10 days). Under the wet-bag treatment, extreme seed deterioration of nearly all genotypes tended to mask their differences in resistance. Incubator weathering was more consistent across experiments than field weathering. Mean seedling emergence scores varied less among experiments for incubator weathering (30, 28, and 22%) than for field weathering (78, 46, and 54%). The genotype x planting date interaction accounted for 7 and 29% of the total sums of squares for incubator and field-weathering, respectively, indicating that incubator weathering minimized environmental effects that would confound comparisons among genotypes of different maturity. The percentage of hard seed after 1 h of soaking ranged from 0 to 64% and was correlated (r = 0.73, P < 0.01) with seedling emergence following incubator weathering. Large-seeded genotypes were generally susceptible to seed weathering and deterioration in storage. Some small-seeded genotypes were resistant; others were susceptible. Black-seeded genotypes were more resistant to incubator weathering than yellow-seeded genotypes. Genotypes with a high percentage of seedling emergence following incubator weathering also had high seedling emergence after ambient storage. Genotypes identified as having resistance to weathering of seed and to deterioration in storage were: INDO 153, INDO 131, INDO 243, INDO 226, INDO 255, ‘Fort Lamy’, ‘Lee A’, INDO 173A, and ‘Biloxi 3’.

Key Words: Glycine max (L.) Merr. • Seed storability • Seed coat color • Impermeable seedcoat • Seed size


1 Contribution of the Int. Inst. of Tropical Agric., Ibadan, Nigeria.

2 Research trainee from the Univ. Nationale du Benin and soybean breeder at the Int. Inst. of Tropical Agric.

Received for publication February 7, 1983.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Crop Science Society of America.